Functional impairment in patients with major depression in clinical remission. (May 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sacchetti, Emilio; Frank, Ellen; Siracusano, Alberto; Racagni, Giorgio; Vita, Antonio; Turrina, Cesare
• Is Part Of: International clinical psychopharmacology. Volume 30:Number 3(2015:May)
• Publication Date: 2015-05
• Subjects: Psychopharmacology -- Periodicals; Psychotropic drugs -- Periodicals; Psychopharmacology -- periodicals; Psychotropic Drugs -- periodicals; 615.7805
• DOI: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000074
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0268-1315

Abstract

<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <p>In recent years, the standard for successful treatment of major depression has switched from response to remission; however, little is known about patients who have achieved remission, but still have some residual symptoms and whether they regain previous levels of functioning. In a large, nationwide, cross-sectional, naturalistic survey (VIVAL-D) of 907 patients with major depression treated with a new course of an antidepressant in 41 Italian community psychiatric centers, patients with a Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, 17-item version (HAM-D<sub>17</sub>) score up to 14 were selected (<italic>n</italic>=499). Of these, 169 were considered to be in remission (HAM-D<sub>17</sub>⩽7) and the other 330 to be mildly depressed. Their level of functioning was evaluated using the SF-12. Only a few (3%) patients in remission were completely symptom free; most were affected by residual symptoms. Patients in remission had better SF-12 scores than those with mild depression, but their functioning was significantly worse than general population norms. In the logistic regression analysis, the HAM-D<sub>17</sub> total score and individual items were predictive of poor functioning. Analysis of sensitivity and specificity values showed that a lower cut-off score (4/5) of the HAM-D<sub>17</sub> scale was best for predicting poor performance so that a reconsideration of the usual cut-off for remission of 7/8 for HAM-D<sub>17</sub> seems overdue.</p> </sec> </abstract>