Health-related quality of life impact in a randomised phase III study of the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with BRAF V600 metastatic melanoma. Issue 7 (May 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Health-related quality of life impact in a randomised phase III study of the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with BRAF V600 metastatic melanoma. Issue 7 (May 2015)
- Main Title:
- Health-related quality of life impact in a randomised phase III study of the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with BRAF V600 metastatic melanoma
- Authors:
- Schadendorf, Dirk
Amonkar, Mayur M.
Stroyakovskiy, Daniil
Levchenko, Evgeny
Gogas, Helen
de Braud, Filippo
Grob, Jean-Jacques
Bondarenko, Igor
Garbe, Claus
Lebbe, Celeste
Larkin, James
Chiarion-Sileni, Vanna
Millward, Michael
Arance, Ana
Mandalà, Mario
Flaherty, Keith T.
Nathan, Paul
Ribas, Antoni
Robert, Caroline
Casey, Michelle
DeMarini, Douglas J.
Irani, Jhangir G.
Aktan, Gursel
Long, Georgina V. - Abstract:
- <abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="ab010"> <title id="st110">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st075">Aim</title> <p id="sp0010">To present the impact of treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) from the double-blind, randomised phase III COMBI-d study that investigated the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with <italic>BRAF</italic> V600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma. COMBI-d showed significantly prolonged progression-free survival for the combination.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st080">Methods</title> <p id="sp0015">HRQoL was evaluated using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30, a generic cancer questionnaire (completed at baseline, during study treatment, at progression and post progression) assessing various dimensions (global health/QoL, functional status, and symptom impact). A mixed-model, repeated-measures analyses of covariance evaluated differences between arms.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st085">Results</title> <p id="sp0020">Questionnaire completion rates were &gt;95% at baseline, &gt;85% to week 40 and &gt;70% at disease progression. Baseline scores across both arms were comparable for all dimensions. Global health dimension scores were significantly better at weeks 8, 16 and 24 for patients receiving the combination during treatment and at progression. The majority of functional dimension scores (physical, social, role,<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="ab010"> <title id="st110">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st075">Aim</title> <p id="sp0010">To present the impact of treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) from the double-blind, randomised phase III COMBI-d study that investigated the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with <italic>BRAF</italic> V600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma. COMBI-d showed significantly prolonged progression-free survival for the combination.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st080">Methods</title> <p id="sp0015">HRQoL was evaluated using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30, a generic cancer questionnaire (completed at baseline, during study treatment, at progression and post progression) assessing various dimensions (global health/QoL, functional status, and symptom impact). A mixed-model, repeated-measures analyses of covariance evaluated differences between arms.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st085">Results</title> <p id="sp0020">Questionnaire completion rates were &gt;95% at baseline, &gt;85% to week 40 and &gt;70% at disease progression. Baseline scores across both arms were comparable for all dimensions. Global health dimension scores were significantly better at weeks 8, 16 and 24 for patients receiving the combination during treatment and at progression. The majority of functional dimension scores (physical, social, role, emotional and cognitive functioning) trended in favour of the combination. Pain scores were significantly improved and clinically meaningful (6–13 point difference) for patients receiving the combination for all follow-up assessments versus those receiving dabrafenib monotherapy. For other symptom dimensions (nausea and vomiting, diarrhoea, dyspnoea, and constipation), scores trended in favour of dabrafenib monotherapy.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st090">Conclusion</title> <p id="sp0025">This analysis demonstrates that the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib provides better preservation of HRQoL and pain improvements versus dabrafenib monotherapy while also delaying progression. (Clinicaltrials.gov registration number: NCT01584648).</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of cancer. Volume 51:Issue 7(2015:May)
- Journal:
- European journal of cancer
- Issue:
- Volume 51:Issue 7(2015:May)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 51, Issue 7 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 51
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0051-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- 833
- Page End:
- 840
- Publication Date:
- 2015-05
- Subjects:
- Cancer -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Périodiques
Cancer
Tumors
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09598049 ↗
http://rzblx1.uni-regensburg.de/ezeit/warpto.phtml?colors=7&jour_id=2879 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09598049 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/09598049 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.03.004 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0959-8049
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.725100
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3343.xml