Comparisons of automated blood pressures in a primary health care setting with self-measurements at the office and at home using the Omron i-C10 device. Issue 2 (April 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparisons of automated blood pressures in a primary health care setting with self-measurements at the office and at home using the Omron i-C10 device. Issue 2 (April 2015)
- Main Title:
- Comparisons of automated blood pressures in a primary health care setting with self-measurements at the office and at home using the Omron i-C10 device
- Authors:
- Al-Karkhi, Isam
Al-Rubaiy, Raad
Rosenqvist, Ulf
Falk, Magnus
Nystrom, Fredrik H. - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Objective</title> <p>We aimed to compare blood pressure (BP) levels recorded using the semiautomatic oscillometric Omron i-C10 BP device in patients with or without hypertension in three different settings: (a) when used by a doctor or a nurse at the office (OBP); (b) when used for self-measurement by the patient at the office (SMOBP); and (c) when used for 7 consecutive days at home (HBP).</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Materials and methods</title> <p>A total of 247 individuals were invited to participate, but 78 of these individuals declined and a further seven were excluded, leaving a final cohort of 162 participants.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results</title> <p>The mean OBP was higher than HBP (difference 8.1±14/3.1±8.8 mmHg, <italic>P</italic>&lt;0.0001) and so was SMOBP compared with HBP (difference 7.0±13/4.2±7.3 mmHg, <italic>P</italic>&lt;0.0001). Sixteen participants (9.9%) had at least 10 mmHg higher systolic SMOBP than OBP and 28 (17%) participants had at least 10 mmHg lower systolic SMOBP than OBP. Participants who were current smokers had a larger mean difference between systolic OBP and SMOBP than nonsmokers (OBP−SMOBP in smokers: 6.6±9.4 mmHg, OBP−SMOBP in nonsmokers: 0.5±9.2 mmHg, <italic>P</italic>=0.011 between groups).</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Self-measurement of BP in the office does not preclude an increase in BP when levels in the individual patients are compared<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Objective</title> <p>We aimed to compare blood pressure (BP) levels recorded using the semiautomatic oscillometric Omron i-C10 BP device in patients with or without hypertension in three different settings: (a) when used by a doctor or a nurse at the office (OBP); (b) when used for self-measurement by the patient at the office (SMOBP); and (c) when used for 7 consecutive days at home (HBP).</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Materials and methods</title> <p>A total of 247 individuals were invited to participate, but 78 of these individuals declined and a further seven were excluded, leaving a final cohort of 162 participants.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results</title> <p>The mean OBP was higher than HBP (difference 8.1±14/3.1±8.8 mmHg, <italic>P</italic>&lt;0.0001) and so was SMOBP compared with HBP (difference 7.0±13/4.2±7.3 mmHg, <italic>P</italic>&lt;0.0001). Sixteen participants (9.9%) had at least 10 mmHg higher systolic SMOBP than OBP and 28 (17%) participants had at least 10 mmHg lower systolic SMOBP than OBP. Participants who were current smokers had a larger mean difference between systolic OBP and SMOBP than nonsmokers (OBP−SMOBP in smokers: 6.6±9.4 mmHg, OBP−SMOBP in nonsmokers: 0.5±9.2 mmHg, <italic>P</italic>=0.011 between groups).</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Self-measurement of BP in the office does not preclude an increase in BP when levels in the individual patients are compared with HBP using the same equipment. Thus, SMOBP with a semiautomatic device does not lead to a reduction in the white-coat effect in the same manner as fully automatic devices.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Blood pressure monitoring. Volume 20:Issue 2(2015)
- Journal:
- Blood pressure monitoring
- Issue:
- Volume 20:Issue 2(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 20, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0020-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-04
- Subjects:
- Blood pressure -- Measurement -- Periodicals
Blood Pressure Determination -- Periodicals
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory -- Periodicals
Blood Pressure Monitors -- Periodicals
Hypertension -- Periodicals
612.140287 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00126097-000000000-00000&NEWS=N ↗
http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=toc&D=yrovft&AN=00126097-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.bpmonitoring.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000088 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1359-5237
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 2113.035500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3777.xml