Directing selectivity of ethanol steam reforming in membrane reactors. (11th May 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Murmura, Maria Anna; Patrascu, Michael; Annesini, Maria Cristina; Palma, Vincenzo; Ruocco, Concetta; Sheintuch, Moshe
• Is Part Of: International journal of hydrogen energy. Volume 40:Number 17(2015)
• Page Start: 5837
• Page End: 5848
• Publication Date: 2015-05-11
• Subjects: Hydrogen as fuel -- Periodicals; Hydrogène (Combustible) -- Périodiques; Hydrogen as fuel; Periodicals; 665.81
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.03.013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0360-3199

Abstract

<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Abstract</title> <sec> <p id="abspara0010">In a system of parallel reversible reactions, separating the corresponding product can enhance a desired reaction. If the same product is produced in several reactions, its concurrent separation enhances the reaction with the higher stoichiometry. Here we demonstrate this effect by separating hydrogen from ethanol during steam reforming in a Pd membrane reactor packed with a Pt/Ni–CeO<sub>2</sub> catalyst. Interest in ethanol SR stems from the need to produce ultra-pure H<sub>2</sub> from renewables (the energy will be supplied by solar-heated molten salt).</p> <p id="abspara0015">For the conditions tested full conversion (of reaction (1) below) has been achieved with H<sub>2</sub>, CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub> and CO as products. These products can be represented by three reactions (W = H<sub>2</sub>O): 1. EtOH ↔ CH<sub>4</sub> + CO + H<sub>2</sub> (ethanol decomposition), 2. CH<sub>4</sub> + 2W ↔ CO<sub>2</sub> + 4H<sub>2</sub> (methane steam reforming, MSR) and 3. CO + W ↔ CO<sub>2</sub> + H<sub>2</sub> (water gas shift, WGS). Separating H<sub>2</sub> directs the selectivity towards CO and CO<sub>2</sub>, resulting also in increased ratio between CO and CH<sub>4</sub> mole fraction.</p> <p id="abspara0020">In general, increasing temperature (613–753 K), pressure (6–10 bar) and introducing sweep flow (0.5 NL/min N<sub>2</sub> for a similar feed rate) led to better separation, to an increase in selectivity towards CO and CO<sub>2</sub> and in hydrogen yield. Increasing pressure and introducing sweep flow also increased hydrogen recovery. A further increase of sweep gas flow rate (to 1 NL/min) did not result in an appreciable improvement.</p> <p id="abspara0025">The results of this work show that the combination of theNi/Pt catalyst and the Pd membrane for hydrogen removal produce very high values of hydrogen yield, despite the low steam to ethanol ratio and the moderate pressure levels. In particular about 4.5 mol H<sup>2</sup>/mol EtOH were produced at 753 K, feed and sweep flow rates of 0.5 NL/min each in the entire pressure range examined. A one-dimensional model based on the kinetics of a limited but realistic set of reactions has been developed to simulate the behavior of the reactor. With a literature kinetics model and only two adjustable parameters, the permeance and heat transfer coefficient, a very good agreement with experimental data has been obtained. The results indicate strong permeance inhibition compared to pure hydrogen measurements.</p> </sec> </abstract>