Liver resection rate following downsizing chemotherapy with cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: UK retrospective observational study. Issue 4 (April 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Liver resection rate following downsizing chemotherapy with cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: UK retrospective observational study. Issue 4 (April 2015)
- Main Title:
- Liver resection rate following downsizing chemotherapy with cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: UK retrospective observational study
- Authors:
- Malik, H.
Khan, A.Z.
Berry, D.P.
Cameron, I.C.
Pope, I.
Sherlock, D.
Helmy, S.
Byrne, B.
Thompson, M.
Pulfer, A.
Davidson, B. - Abstract:
- <abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Aims</title> <p id="abspara0010">The high objective response rate to cetuximab along with chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases makes it an effective downsizing protocol to facilitate surgery in those with initially unresectable disease. Adoption of this strategy has been variable in the UK. A retrospective observational study was conducted in 7 UK specialist liver surgical centres to describe the liver resection rate following a downsizing protocol of cetuximab and chemotherapy and to evaluate the quality and efficiency of processes by which the treatment was provided.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Methods</title> <p id="abspara0015">Data were collected in 2012 by reviewing medical records of patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver, defined as unresectable without downsizing therapy at first review by a specialist Multi Disciplinary Team (MDT).</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Results</title> <p id="abspara0020">Sixty patients were included; 29 (48%) underwent liver resection following cetuximab and chemotherapy. Of the 29, 17 (59% or 28% of all patients) achieved R<sub>0</sub> resection and 7 (24% or 12% of all patients) R<sub>1</sub> resection. All treated patients were KRAS wild-type.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0030">Conclusion</title> <p id="abspara0025">In specialist<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Aims</title> <p id="abspara0010">The high objective response rate to cetuximab along with chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases makes it an effective downsizing protocol to facilitate surgery in those with initially unresectable disease. Adoption of this strategy has been variable in the UK. A retrospective observational study was conducted in 7 UK specialist liver surgical centres to describe the liver resection rate following a downsizing protocol of cetuximab and chemotherapy and to evaluate the quality and efficiency of processes by which the treatment was provided.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Methods</title> <p id="abspara0015">Data were collected in 2012 by reviewing medical records of patients with colorectal metastases confined to the liver, defined as unresectable without downsizing therapy at first review by a specialist Multi Disciplinary Team (MDT).</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Results</title> <p id="abspara0020">Sixty patients were included; 29 (48%) underwent liver resection following cetuximab and chemotherapy. Of the 29, 17 (59% or 28% of all patients) achieved R<sub>0</sub> resection and 7 (24% or 12% of all patients) R<sub>1</sub> resection. All treated patients were KRAS wild-type.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0030">Conclusion</title> <p id="abspara0025">In specialist liver surgical centres, where patients are evaluated for liver resection, optimal management by MDT using KRAS testing, cetuximab and chemotherapy results in a 28% R<sub>0</sub> resection rate in patients with initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of surgical oncology. Volume 41:Issue 4(2015:Apr.)
- Journal:
- European journal of surgical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 41:Issue 4(2015:Apr.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 41, Issue 4 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 41
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0041-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 499
- Page End:
- 505
- Publication Date:
- 2015-04
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- surgery -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Oncologie
Chirurgie (geneeskunde)
Electronic journals
Electronic journals -- Sciences
Electronic journals -- Medicine
Electronic journals
616.994059005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.ejso.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/0720048X ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0748-7983;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com/cgi-bin/links/toc/ejso ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.01.032 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0748-7983
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.745500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2976.xml