Do elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer get the best out of recent advances in first-line treatment? A comparative study in two tertiary cancer centers in Greece. Issue 2 (March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Do elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer get the best out of recent advances in first-line treatment? A comparative study in two tertiary cancer centers in Greece. Issue 2 (March 2015)
- Main Title:
- Do elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer get the best out of recent advances in first-line treatment? A comparative study in two tertiary cancer centers in Greece
- Authors:
- Bakogeorgos, Marios
Mountzios, Giannis
Bournakis, Evangelos
Economopoulou, Panagiota
Kotsantis, Giannis
Fytrakis, Nikolaos
Kouvatseas, Georgios
Dimopoulos, Meletios-Athanassios
Kentepozidis, Nikolaos - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="author" id="ab0005"> <title id="st0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st0010">Background</title> <p id="sp0005">Elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are thought to receive suboptimal treatment mainly due to concerns for poor compliance and/or excessive toxicity.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0050">Patients and Methods</title> <p id="sp0015">Using the age of 70 years as the pre-defined cut-off, we compared elderly patients with advanced NSCLC suitable for first line chemotherapy with their younger counterparts in terms of: i) diagnosis and disease characteristics ii) adherence to treatment schedule, including dose intensity (DI), and relative dose intensity (RDI), iii) toxicity, tolerance, and efficacy outcomes.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0015">Results</title> <p id="sp0020">Among 292 eligible patients, data were available for 245, of whom 107 (43.7%) belonged to the elderly group. This group was more likely to present with co-morbidities, non-smoking current status and diagnosis based on cytology alone. As compared to the non-elderly, elderly patients were more likely to receive single-agent therapy (8.0% vs. 29.2% respectively, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) and less likely to receive platinum-based chemotherapy (80.3% vs. 57.9%, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). Elderly patients also received docetaxel (24.3% vs. 40.4%), and bevacizumab (7.5% vs. 21.3%) significantly less often and received oral vinorelbine (24.3%<abstract abstract-type="author" id="ab0005"> <title id="st0005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st0010">Background</title> <p id="sp0005">Elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are thought to receive suboptimal treatment mainly due to concerns for poor compliance and/or excessive toxicity.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0050">Patients and Methods</title> <p id="sp0015">Using the age of 70 years as the pre-defined cut-off, we compared elderly patients with advanced NSCLC suitable for first line chemotherapy with their younger counterparts in terms of: i) diagnosis and disease characteristics ii) adherence to treatment schedule, including dose intensity (DI), and relative dose intensity (RDI), iii) toxicity, tolerance, and efficacy outcomes.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0015">Results</title> <p id="sp0020">Among 292 eligible patients, data were available for 245, of whom 107 (43.7%) belonged to the elderly group. This group was more likely to present with co-morbidities, non-smoking current status and diagnosis based on cytology alone. As compared to the non-elderly, elderly patients were more likely to receive single-agent therapy (8.0% vs. 29.2% respectively, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) and less likely to receive platinum-based chemotherapy (80.3% vs. 57.9%, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). Elderly patients also received docetaxel (24.3% vs. 40.4%), and bevacizumab (7.5% vs. 21.3%) significantly less often and received oral vinorelbine (24.3% vs. 11.8%) more frequently. Non-elderly patients were more likely to receive any of the cytotoxic drugs with RDI &gt; 0.8 (49.6% vs. 33.0%, <italic>p</italic> = 0.012) and RDI &gt; 0.9 (29.6% vs. 16%, <italic>p</italic> = 0.015). Substantial toxicity, as well as median overall survival did not differ significantly between the two groups.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st0020">Conclusions</title> <p id="sp0025">Only one third of the elderly patients received at least 80% of the scheduled treatment intensity. Nearly half received diagnosis based on cytology alone, which may deprive them from new, histology-driven, therapeutic approaches.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of geriatric oncology. Volume 6:Issue 2(2015)
- Journal:
- Journal of geriatric oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 6:Issue 2(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 6, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 6
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0006-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 111
- Page End:
- 118
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03
- Subjects:
- Geriatric oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Aged -- Periodicals
Geriatric oncology
Electronic journals
Periodicals
618.976994005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/18794068 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/18794068 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/18794068 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jgo.2014.11.001 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1879-4068
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3604.xml