Interruption versus continuation of trabectedin in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (T-DIS): a randomised phase 2 trial. Issue 3 (March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Interruption versus continuation of trabectedin in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (T-DIS): a randomised phase 2 trial. Issue 3 (March 2015)
- Main Title:
- Interruption versus continuation of trabectedin in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma (T-DIS): a randomised phase 2 trial
- Authors:
- Cesne, Axel Le
Blay, Jean-Yves
Domont, Julien
Tresch-Bruneel, Emmanuelle
Chevreau, Christine
Bertucci, François
Delcambre, Corinne
Saada-Bouzid, Esma
Piperno-Neumann, Sophie
Bay, Jacques-Olivier
Mir, Olivier
Ray-Coquard, Isabelle
Ryckewaert, Thomas
Valentin, Thibaud
Isambert, Nicolas
Italiano, Antoine
Clisant, Stéphanie
Penel, Nicolas - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="author" id="ceab10"> <title id="cestitle10">Summary</title> <sec> <title id="cestitle20">Background</title> <p id="spara160">The benefit or harm of trabectedin discontinuation in patients with non-progressive soft-tissue sarcoma remains unclear. We report the final analysis of a phase 2 trial investigating the clinical benefit of continuation of trabectedin treatment until progression versus interruption of therapy after six treatment cycles in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="cestitle30">Methods</title> <p id="spara170">For this open-label, non-comparative, multicentre, phase 2 study, eligible adult patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas, who had previously received doxorubicin-based chemotherapy and were able to receive trabectedin, were enrolled from 14 centres of the French Sarcoma Group. Trabectedin was administered at a dose of 1·5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> through a central venous line as a 24-h continuous infusion every 3 weeks. After the initial six cycles of trabectedin, patients who were free from progressive disease were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio either to continuous treatment or therapy interruption. Randomisation was done centrally by a computer-generated system using permuted blocks of four patients, stratified by tumour grade and performance status. Patients allocated to the interruption group were allowed to restart trabectedin in case of progressive disease. The primary endpoint was<abstract abstract-type="author" id="ceab10"> <title id="cestitle10">Summary</title> <sec> <title id="cestitle20">Background</title> <p id="spara160">The benefit or harm of trabectedin discontinuation in patients with non-progressive soft-tissue sarcoma remains unclear. We report the final analysis of a phase 2 trial investigating the clinical benefit of continuation of trabectedin treatment until progression versus interruption of therapy after six treatment cycles in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="cestitle30">Methods</title> <p id="spara170">For this open-label, non-comparative, multicentre, phase 2 study, eligible adult patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas, who had previously received doxorubicin-based chemotherapy and were able to receive trabectedin, were enrolled from 14 centres of the French Sarcoma Group. Trabectedin was administered at a dose of 1·5 mg/m<sup>2</sup> through a central venous line as a 24-h continuous infusion every 3 weeks. After the initial six cycles of trabectedin, patients who were free from progressive disease were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio either to continuous treatment or therapy interruption. Randomisation was done centrally by a computer-generated system using permuted blocks of four patients, stratified by tumour grade and performance status. Patients allocated to the interruption group were allowed to restart trabectedin in case of progressive disease. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at 6 months after randomisation, analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with <ext-link ext-link-type="unknown" id="interrefs10" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://ClinicalTrials.gov" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">ClinicalTrials.gov</ext-link>, number <ext-link ext-link-type="unknown" id="interrefs20" xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="ctgov:NCT01303094" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">NCT01303094</ext-link>.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="cestitle40">Results</title> <p id="spara180">In 178 evaluable patients, 91 (51%) patients had not progressed after six cycles. Of these patients, 53 patients were randomly assigned to the two treatment groups: 27 to the continuation group and 26 to the interruption group. Overall, patients in the two groups received a similar median number of trabectedin cycles (continuation group: 11 cycles [range 6–31+] <italic>vs</italic> interruption group: 11 [range 6–23+]). After randomisation, progression-free survival at 6 months was 51·9% (95% CI 31·9–68·6) in the continuation group versus 23·1% (9·4–40·3) in the interruption group (p=0·0200). The occurrence of treatment-related grade 3 adverse events (four [16%] of 25 patients in the continuation group <italic>vs</italic> three [14%] of 21 in the interruption group) and grade 4 adverse events (one [4%] <italic>vs</italic> none) was similar in both groups. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities were alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase increases (one [4%] in the interruption group <italic>vs</italic> three [14%] in the continuation group), neutropenia (two [8%] <italic>vs</italic> two [10%]), and intestinal occlusion (one [4%] <italic>vs</italic> one [5%]).</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="cestitle50">Interpretation</title> <p id="spara190">We do not recommend trabectedin discontinuation in patients with advanced, doxorubicin-refractory soft-tissue sarcoma who have not progressed after six cycles of treatment.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="cestitle60">Funding</title> <p id="spara200">The French National Cancer Institute (INCa) and PharmaMar SA.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Lancet oncology. Volume 16:Issue 3(2015:Mar.)
- Journal:
- Lancet oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 16:Issue 3(2015:Mar.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 16, Issue 3 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 16
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0016-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 312
- Page End:
- 319
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- Periodicals
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Oncologie
Oncology
Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.994005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14702045 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70031-8 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1470-2045
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5146.090000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4221.xml