Once you're choosing, nobody's perfect: is more information necessarily better in oocyte donor selection?. Issue 3 (March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Once you're choosing, nobody's perfect: is more information necessarily better in oocyte donor selection?. Issue 3 (March 2015)
- Main Title:
- Once you're choosing, nobody's perfect: is more information necessarily better in oocyte donor selection?
- Authors:
- Rubin, Lisa R.
de Melo-Martin, Inmaculada
Rosenwaks, Zev
Cholst, Ina N. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="author" id="ab0010"> <title id="st0010">Abstract</title> <sec> <p id="sp0010">Despite a growing body of research examining the psychosocial issues involved in oocyte donation, few studies have examined the role of information in the process of donor selection. The aim of this interview-based qualitative study was to understand how donor oocyte recipients relate to information provided about potential oocyte donors, how they use this information to select donors and their preferences for, and reactions to, various types of information provided to them. Donor oocyte recipients who underwent treatment between 1995 and 2011 were recruited for participation from an academic centre for reproductive medicine. Twenty-two oocyte donor recipients participated. Findings indicate that recipients use information to select donors who they believe would enable them to fulfill their priorities: having a healthy child and 'passing' as genetically related. Obtaining more specific information prompted a focus on donor imperfections and presented a burden of choosing. Moreover, for participants preferring distance, having more information created dilemmas by making the donors less abstract. Although more information and options are often desired by oocyte donor recipients, increased choice can also present psychological dilemmas and emotional costs. Further research is needed to investigate the influence of information-related conflicts on patient decision-making,<abstract abstract-type="author" id="ab0010"> <title id="st0010">Abstract</title> <sec> <p id="sp0010">Despite a growing body of research examining the psychosocial issues involved in oocyte donation, few studies have examined the role of information in the process of donor selection. The aim of this interview-based qualitative study was to understand how donor oocyte recipients relate to information provided about potential oocyte donors, how they use this information to select donors and their preferences for, and reactions to, various types of information provided to them. Donor oocyte recipients who underwent treatment between 1995 and 2011 were recruited for participation from an academic centre for reproductive medicine. Twenty-two oocyte donor recipients participated. Findings indicate that recipients use information to select donors who they believe would enable them to fulfill their priorities: having a healthy child and 'passing' as genetically related. Obtaining more specific information prompted a focus on donor imperfections and presented a burden of choosing. Moreover, for participants preferring distance, having more information created dilemmas by making the donors less abstract. Although more information and options are often desired by oocyte donor recipients, increased choice can also present psychological dilemmas and emotional costs. Further research is needed to investigate the influence of information-related conflicts on patient decision-making, post-treatment emotional adjustment and disclosure decisions.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Reproductive biomedicine online. Volume 30:Issue 3(2015)
- Journal:
- Reproductive biomedicine online
- Issue:
- Volume 30:Issue 3(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 30, Issue 3 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 30
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0030-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 311
- Page End:
- 318
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03
- Subjects:
- Human reproductive technology -- Periodicals
Human embryo -- Periodicals
Reproduction -- Periodicals
616.692 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.rbmonline.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/14726483 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.11.017 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1472-6483
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7713.705600
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - Digital store
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4242.xml