Comorbidity predicts poor prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Development and validation of a predictive score model. Issue 2 (February 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comorbidity predicts poor prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Development and validation of a predictive score model. Issue 2 (February 2015)
- Main Title:
- Comorbidity predicts poor prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Development and validation of a predictive score model
- Authors:
- Guo, Rui
Chen, Xiao-Zhong
Chen, Lei
Jiang, Feng
Tang, Ling-Long
Mao, Yan-Ping
Zhou, Guan-Qun
Li, Wen-Fei
Liu, Li-Zhi
Tian, Li
Lin, Ai-Hua
Ma, Jun - Abstract:
- <abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="ab005"> <title id="st090">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st095">Background and purpose</title> <p id="sp0005">The impact of comorbidity on prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is poorly characterized.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st100">Material and methods</title> <p id="sp0010">Using the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27) system, we assessed the prognostic value of comorbidity and developed, validated and confirmed a predictive score model in a training set (<italic>n</italic> = 658), internal validation set (<italic>n</italic> = 658) and independent set (<italic>n</italic> = 652) using area under the receiver operating curve analysis.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st105">Results</title> <p id="sp0015">Comorbidity was present in 40.4% of 1968 patients (mild, 30.1%; moderate, 9.1%; severe, 1.2%). Compared to an ACE-27 score ⩽1, patients with an ACE-27 score &gt;1 in the training set had shorter overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (both <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001), similar results were obtained in the other sets (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). In multivariate analysis, ACE-27 score was a significant independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS. The combined risk score model including ACE-27 had superior prognostic value to TNM stage alone in the internal validation set (0.70 vs. 0.66; <italic>P</italic> = 0.02), independent set (0.73 vs. 0.67; <italic>P</italic> = 0.002) and all patients<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="ab005"> <title id="st090">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st095">Background and purpose</title> <p id="sp0005">The impact of comorbidity on prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is poorly characterized.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st100">Material and methods</title> <p id="sp0010">Using the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27) system, we assessed the prognostic value of comorbidity and developed, validated and confirmed a predictive score model in a training set (<italic>n</italic> = 658), internal validation set (<italic>n</italic> = 658) and independent set (<italic>n</italic> = 652) using area under the receiver operating curve analysis.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st105">Results</title> <p id="sp0015">Comorbidity was present in 40.4% of 1968 patients (mild, 30.1%; moderate, 9.1%; severe, 1.2%). Compared to an ACE-27 score ⩽1, patients with an ACE-27 score &gt;1 in the training set had shorter overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) (both <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001), similar results were obtained in the other sets (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). In multivariate analysis, ACE-27 score was a significant independent prognostic factor for OS and DFS. The combined risk score model including ACE-27 had superior prognostic value to TNM stage alone in the internal validation set (0.70 vs. 0.66; <italic>P</italic> = 0.02), independent set (0.73 vs. 0.67; <italic>P</italic> = 0.002) and all patients (0.71 vs. 0.67; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001).</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st110">Conclusions</title> <p id="sp0020">Comorbidity significantly affects prognosis, especially in stages II and III, and should be incorporated into the TNM staging system for NPC. Assessment of comorbidity may improve outcome prediction and help tailor individualized treatment.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Radiotherapy and oncology. Volume 114:Issue 2(2015:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Radiotherapy and oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 114:Issue 2(2015:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 114, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 114
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0114-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 249
- Page End:
- 256
- Publication Date:
- 2015-02
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Tumors -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Tumeurs -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
616.9940642 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01678140 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01678140 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/01678140 ↗
http://www.estro.org/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/radiotherapy-and-oncology/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.radonc.2014.12.002 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0167-8140
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7240.790000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4110.xml