Using Twitter in crisis management for organizations bearing different country-of-origin perceptions. Issue 3 (3rd August 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Using Twitter in crisis management for organizations bearing different country-of-origin perceptions. Issue 3 (3rd August 2015)
- Main Title:
- Using Twitter in crisis management for organizations bearing different country-of-origin perceptions
- Authors:
- Xu, Jie
Wu, Yiye - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title> <x content-type="archive" xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Purpose</title> <p> – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of using Twitter on American stakeholders' crisis appraisal for organizations originated from two foreign countries with distinctively different perceptions. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Design/methodology/approach</title> <p> – This study uses a 2 (medium: Twitter vs news release)×2 (country-of-origin: China vs France) factorial experiment. The participants (<italic>n</italic>=393) are recruited through the Amazon Mechanical Turk system (Mturks). </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Findings</title> <p> – The findings suggest that using Twitter substantially mitigates participants' negative evaluation of the organization undergoing a crisis. Country-of-origin affects how individuals perceive the organization after it has experienced a crisis. In addition, participants' product involvement intensifies the reputational threat specifically for the organization with a less favorable country-of-origin perception. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Originality/value</title> <p> – This study is one of the few empirically based studies in international public relations research, using an experiment to extrapolate the effects of social media and country-of-origin on consumers' crisis appraisal. This<abstract> <title> <x content-type="archive" xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Purpose</title> <p> – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effects of using Twitter on American stakeholders' crisis appraisal for organizations originated from two foreign countries with distinctively different perceptions. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Design/methodology/approach</title> <p> – This study uses a 2 (medium: Twitter vs news release)×2 (country-of-origin: China vs France) factorial experiment. The participants (<italic>n</italic>=393) are recruited through the Amazon Mechanical Turk system (Mturks). </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Findings</title> <p> – The findings suggest that using Twitter substantially mitigates participants' negative evaluation of the organization undergoing a crisis. Country-of-origin affects how individuals perceive the organization after it has experienced a crisis. In addition, participants' product involvement intensifies the reputational threat specifically for the organization with a less favorable country-of-origin perception. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Originality/value</title> <p> – This study is one of the few empirically based studies in international public relations research, using an experiment to extrapolate the effects of social media and country-of-origin on consumers' crisis appraisal. This investigation reinforces the need to consider social media not just at the individual level, but also as a form of communication that can have broader consequences at the organizational level. In addition, it is important for company leaders to understand that the organization's home country image may exacerbate the negative management outcomes during a crisis. It is expected that this study yields theoretically indicative, empirically informative, and culturally relevant results.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of communication management. Volume 19:Issue 3(2015)
- Journal:
- Journal of communication management
- Issue:
- Volume 19:Issue 3(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 19, Issue 3 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 19
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0019-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 239
- Page End:
- 253
- Publication Date:
- 2015-08-03
- Subjects:
- Communication in management -- Periodicals
Communication in marketing -- Periodicals
Business communication -- Periodicals
658.45 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?issn=1363-254x ↗
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/hsp/jcm ↗
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=1363-254x;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1108/JCOM-06-2013-0050 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1363-254X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4961.634900
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3577.xml