Treatment choices for patients with invasive lobular breast cancer: a doctor survey. Issue 4 (9th June 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Treatment choices for patients with invasive lobular breast cancer: a doctor survey. Issue 4 (9th June 2015)
- Main Title:
- Treatment choices for patients with invasive lobular breast cancer: a doctor survey
- Authors:
- Jacobs, Carmel
Ibrahim, Mohamed F.K.
Clemons, Mark
Hutton, Brian
Simos, Demetrios
Caudrelier, Jean‐Michel
Graham, Ian D.
Smith, Stephanie
Addison, Christina
Arnaout, Angel - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jep12379-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Rationale, aims and objectives</title> <p>Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) has distinct features that present challenges for management. We surveyed doctors regarding management approaches, opinions on quality of evidence supporting their practice, and future research needs.</p> </sec> <sec id="jep12379-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>An online questionnaire was developed and circulated to breast cancer surgical, radiation and medical oncologists.</p> </sec> <sec id="jep12379-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>The questionnaire was completed by 88/428 doctors (20.6%); 22/56 (39.3%) surgeons, 21/64 (32.8%) radiation oncologists and 45/308 (14.6%) medical oncologists. The majority (65%) of surgeons were comfortable treating ILC patients using the same surgical management as patients with invasive ductal cancers (IDC). Furthermore, 25% would perform a similar surgery but would obtain larger gross margins. There was equipoise for radiation oncologists regarding whether or not ILC was an independent risk factor for local‐regional recurrence after either breast‐conserving surgery or mastectomy. Of those radiation oncologists who believe ILC is an independent risk factor for recurrence after mastectomy, 44.4% would offer radiation in the absence of usual indications. Medical oncologists approached systemic therapy for ILC<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="jep12379-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Rationale, aims and objectives</title> <p>Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) has distinct features that present challenges for management. We surveyed doctors regarding management approaches, opinions on quality of evidence supporting their practice, and future research needs.</p> </sec> <sec id="jep12379-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>An online questionnaire was developed and circulated to breast cancer surgical, radiation and medical oncologists.</p> </sec> <sec id="jep12379-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>The questionnaire was completed by 88/428 doctors (20.6%); 22/56 (39.3%) surgeons, 21/64 (32.8%) radiation oncologists and 45/308 (14.6%) medical oncologists. The majority (65%) of surgeons were comfortable treating ILC patients using the same surgical management as patients with invasive ductal cancers (IDC). Furthermore, 25% would perform a similar surgery but would obtain larger gross margins. There was equipoise for radiation oncologists regarding whether or not ILC was an independent risk factor for local‐regional recurrence after either breast‐conserving surgery or mastectomy. Of those radiation oncologists who believe ILC is an independent risk factor for recurrence after mastectomy, 44.4% would offer radiation in the absence of usual indications. Medical oncologists approached systemic therapy for ILC patients similarly to those with comparable IDCs. Areas identified as most controversial and requiring future research were preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, radiotherapy post‐mastectomy and the responsiveness of ILC to adjuvant chemotherapy compared with endocrine therapy.</p> </sec> <sec id="jep12379-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>There is a variation in doctors' beliefs, management and opinions regarding the quality of evidence for the management of ILC. Clinical trials specifically assessing the management of ILC are required to guide clinical practice.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of evaluation in clinical practice. Volume 21:Issue 4(2015)
- Journal:
- Journal of evaluation in clinical practice
- Issue:
- Volume 21:Issue 4(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 21, Issue 4 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 21
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0021-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 740
- Page End:
- 748
- Publication Date:
- 2015-06-09
- Subjects:
- Clinical medicine -- Periodicals
616.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2753 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/jep.12379 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1356-1294
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4979.640800
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3569.xml