Foraging behaviour of the parasitoid Eretmocerus eremicus under intraguild predation risk by Macrolophus pygmaeus. Issue 9 (1st December 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Velasco‐Hernández, María Concepción; Ramirez‐Romero, Ricardo; Sánchez‐Hernández, Carla; Biondi, Antonio; Muñoz‐Urias, Alejandro; Desneux, Nicolas
• Is Part Of: Pest management science. Volume 71:Issue 9(2015:Sep.)
• Page Start: 1346
• Page End: 1353
• Publication Date: 2014-12-01
• Subjects: Pests -- Control -- Periodicals; Pesticides -- Periodicals; 632.9
• DOI: 10.1002/ps.3938
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1526-498X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="ps3938-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="ps3938-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>BACKGROUND</title> <p id="ps3938-para-0001">Intraguild predation (IGP), predation between species that use a common resource, can affect the populations of a pest, of the pest's natural enemy (IG prey) and of the predator of the pest's natural enemy (IG predator). In this study, we determined whether the parasitoid <italic>Eretmocerus eremicus</italic> (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) (IG prey), modifies its foraging behaviour under the risk of IGP by <italic>Macrolophus pygmaeus</italic> (Hemiptera: Miridae) (IG predator). Parasitoid behaviour was analysed using two bioassays (choice and no‐choice) with the following treatments: (i) control, tomato leaf infested with whitefly nymphs; and (ii) PEP, tomato leaf infested with whitefly nymphs and previously exposed to the IG predator; and (iii) PP, tomato leaf infested with whitefly nymphs, with both, the IG predator and the IG prey present.</p> </sec> <sec id="ps3938-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>RESULTS</title> <p id="ps3938-para-0002">In both bioassays, we found that <italic>E. eremicus</italic> did not significantly modify the number of ovipositions, time of residence, duration of oviposition or behavioural sequence. However, in the no‐choice bioassay, the number of attacks was higher and their duration shorter in the PEP treatment than in the control.</p> </sec> <sec id="ps3938-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>CONCLUSION</title> <p id="ps3938-para-0003">Our results indicate that the parasitoid may detect IGP risk to a certain extent, but it did not significantly modify its foraging behaviour, suggesting that simultaneous release of the two natural enemies can be successfully employed. © 2014 Society of Chemical Industry</p> </sec> </abstract>