Patient‐Perceived Pressure from Clinicians for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery: A Population‐Based Survey of U.S. Women. (23rd September 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Patient‐Perceived Pressure from Clinicians for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery: A Population‐Based Survey of U.S. Women. (23rd September 2014)
- Main Title:
- Patient‐Perceived Pressure from Clinicians for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery: A Population‐Based Survey of U.S. Women
- Authors:
- Jou, Judy
Kozhimannil, Katy B.
Johnson, Pamela Jo
Sakala, Carol - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="hesr12231-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="hesr12231-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To determine whether patient‐perceived pressure from clinicians for labor induction or cesarean delivery is significantly associated with having these procedures.</p> </sec> <sec id="hesr12231-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Data Sources/Study Setting</title> <p> <italic>Listening to Mothers III</italic>, a nationally representative survey of women 18–45 years who delivered a singleton infant in a U.S. hospital July 2011–June 2012 (<italic>N</italic> = 2, 400).</p> </sec> <sec id="hesr12231-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Study Design</title> <p>Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with perceived pressure and estimation of odds of induction and cesarean given perceived pressure.</p> </sec> <sec id="hesr12231-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Principal Findings</title> <p>Overall, 14.8 percent of respondents perceived pressure from a clinician for labor induction and 13.3 percent for cesarean delivery. Women who perceived pressure for labor induction had higher odds of induction overall (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.51; 95 percent confidence interval [CI]: 2.5–5.0) and without medical reason (aOR: 2.13; 95 percent CI: 1.3–3.4) compared with women who did not perceive pressure. Those perceiving pressure for cesarean delivery had higher odds of cesarean<abstract abstract-type="main" id="hesr12231-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="hesr12231-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To determine whether patient‐perceived pressure from clinicians for labor induction or cesarean delivery is significantly associated with having these procedures.</p> </sec> <sec id="hesr12231-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Data Sources/Study Setting</title> <p> <italic>Listening to Mothers III</italic>, a nationally representative survey of women 18–45 years who delivered a singleton infant in a U.S. hospital July 2011–June 2012 (<italic>N</italic> = 2, 400).</p> </sec> <sec id="hesr12231-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Study Design</title> <p>Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with perceived pressure and estimation of odds of induction and cesarean given perceived pressure.</p> </sec> <sec id="hesr12231-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Principal Findings</title> <p>Overall, 14.8 percent of respondents perceived pressure from a clinician for labor induction and 13.3 percent for cesarean delivery. Women who perceived pressure for labor induction had higher odds of induction overall (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.51; 95 percent confidence interval [CI]: 2.5–5.0) and without medical reason (aOR: 2.13; 95 percent CI: 1.3–3.4) compared with women who did not perceive pressure. Those perceiving pressure for cesarean delivery had higher odds of cesarean overall (aOR: 5.17; 95 percent CI: 3.2–8.4), without medical reason (aOR: 6.13; 95 percent CI: 3.4–11.1), and unplanned cesarean (aOR: 6.70; 95 percent CI: 4.0–11.3).</p> </sec> <sec id="hesr12231-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Patient‐perceived pressure from clinicians significantly predicts labor induction and cesarean delivery. Efforts to reduce provider–patient miscommunication and minimize potentially unnecessary procedures may be warranted.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Health services research. Volume 50:Number 4(2015)
- Journal:
- Health services research
- Issue:
- Volume 50:Number 4(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 50, Issue 4 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 50
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0050-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 961
- Page End:
- 981
- Publication Date:
- 2014-09-23
- Subjects:
- Medical care -- Periodicals
Medical care -- Evaluation -- Periodicals
Hospital care -- Periodicals
Health services administration -- Periodicals
362 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1475-6773 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/servlet/useragent?func=showIssues&code=hesr&open=2003#C2003 ↗
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0017-9124&site=1 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/1475-6773.12231 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0017-9124
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4275.120000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3025.xml