Addressing Public Health informatics patient privacy concerns. Issue 2 (7th April 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Birnbaum, David; Borycki, Elizabeth; Karras, Bryant Thomas; Denham, Elizabeth; Lacroix, Paulette
• Is Part Of: Clinical governance. Volume 20:Issue 2(2015)
• Page Start: 91
• Page End: 100
• Publication Date: 2015-04-07
• Subjects: Medical care -- Quality control -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Evaluation -- Periodicals; Outcome assessment (Medical care) -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Finance -- Periodicals; 362.1068
• DOI: 10.1108/CGIJ-05-2015-0013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1477-7274

Abstract

<abstract> <title> <x content-type="archive" xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Purpose</title> <p> – The purpose of this paper is to review stakeholder perspectives and provide a framework for improving governance in health data stewardship. Patients may wish to view their own lab results or clinical records, but others (notably academics, journalists and lawyers) tend to want scores of patient records in their search for patterns or trends. Public Health informatics capabilities are growing in scope and speed as clinical information systems, health information exchange networks and other potential database linkages enable more access to healthcare data. This change facilitates novel service improvements, but also raises new personal privacy protection issues. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Design/methodology/approach</title> <p> – This paper summarizes a panel session discussion from the 2015 Information Technology and Communication in Health biennial international conference. The perspectives of health service research, journalism, Public Health informatics and privacy protection were represented. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Findings</title> <p> – In North America, an expectation of personal privacy exists as a quasi-constitutional right. Individuals should be allowed to control the amount of information shared about them, and in particular the public expects that details of their personal healthcare data are protected. This is supported by laws, regulations and administrative structures; however, there are fundamental differences between the approaches taken in Canada and in the USA. In both countries, population and Public Health has wide powers to collect data and share it appropriately in order to accomplish a social good. A recent report issued by the British Columbia Information and Privacy Commissioner, and a recent story issued by the Bloomberg News service, highlight ways in which laws and regulations have not kept pace with advances in technology. Changes are needed to enable population and Public Health agencies to protect confidential personal information while still being able to comply with legitimate requests for data by researchers, policy makers and the public at large. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Originality/value</title> <p> – Similarities and differences in approach, gaps, current issues and recommendations of several countries were revealed in a conference session. Those concepts and the likelihood of ensuing legislative changes directly impact healthcare organizations' patients and leadership.</p> </sec> </abstract>