Head‐to‐head comparison between two screening systems for HBsAG, anti‐HBc, anti‐HCV and HIV combination immunoassays in an international, multicentre evaluation study. Issue 2 (20th April 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Head‐to‐head comparison between two screening systems for HBsAG, anti‐HBc, anti‐HCV and HIV combination immunoassays in an international, multicentre evaluation study. Issue 2 (20th April 2015)
- Main Title:
- Head‐to‐head comparison between two screening systems for HBsAG, anti‐HBc, anti‐HCV and HIV combination immunoassays in an international, multicentre evaluation study
- Authors:
- Schmidt, M.
Jimenez, A.
Mühlbacher, A.
Oota, S.
Blanco, L.
Sakuldamrongpanich, T.
Schennach, H.
Seifried, E. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="vox12259-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="vox12259-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Mandatory screening of blood donations for hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses and human immunodeficiency viruses 1 and 2 requires assays with exceptional sensitivity and specificity. This study reports the results from a direct head‐to‐head comparison of the Elecsys HBsAG II, Elecsys Anti‐HBc, Elecsys Anti‐HCV II and Elecsys HIV combi PT immunoassays with the respective ABBOTT PRISM/Architect instrument immunoassays in a multicentre blood bank evaluation study.</p> </sec> <sec id="vox12259-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Study Design and Methods</title> <p>Assay validation was performed in the blood screening laboratories of four blood bank centres in Austria, Germany, Spain and Thailand, where both first‐time donor samples (approximately 6000 donors) and repeat donor samples (approximately 14 000 donors) were screened.</p> </sec> <sec id="vox12259-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Of all screened donor samples, 93 (0·46%) were confirmed to be positive using assays from both manufacturers. The specificity of all immunoassays was &gt;99·5% and was comparable between first‐time and multiple‐time donors. A direct comparison between the assays from Roche and ABBOTT according to Bland and Altman analysis demonstrated equivalent quality.</p> </sec> <sec<abstract abstract-type="main" id="vox12259-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="vox12259-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Mandatory screening of blood donations for hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses and human immunodeficiency viruses 1 and 2 requires assays with exceptional sensitivity and specificity. This study reports the results from a direct head‐to‐head comparison of the Elecsys HBsAG II, Elecsys Anti‐HBc, Elecsys Anti‐HCV II and Elecsys HIV combi PT immunoassays with the respective ABBOTT PRISM/Architect instrument immunoassays in a multicentre blood bank evaluation study.</p> </sec> <sec id="vox12259-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Study Design and Methods</title> <p>Assay validation was performed in the blood screening laboratories of four blood bank centres in Austria, Germany, Spain and Thailand, where both first‐time donor samples (approximately 6000 donors) and repeat donor samples (approximately 14 000 donors) were screened.</p> </sec> <sec id="vox12259-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Of all screened donor samples, 93 (0·46%) were confirmed to be positive using assays from both manufacturers. The specificity of all immunoassays was &gt;99·5% and was comparable between first‐time and multiple‐time donors. A direct comparison between the assays from Roche and ABBOTT according to Bland and Altman analysis demonstrated equivalent quality.</p> </sec> <sec id="vox12259-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>These results suggest that the Elecsys immunoassays for HBV, HCV and HIV infection, with a comparative sensitivity of 100% and a specificity exceeding the common technical specification threshold of &gt;99·5%, meet the stringent performance criteria stipulated for blood donor screening for these infectious agents. Significant differences in the specificity between first‐time and repeat donors were not detectable.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Vox sanguinis. Volume 109:Issue 2(2015)
- Journal:
- Vox sanguinis
- Issue:
- Volume 109:Issue 2(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 109, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 109
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0109-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 114
- Page End:
- 121
- Publication Date:
- 2015-04-20
- Subjects:
- Blood -- Periodicals
Blood -- Transfusion -- Periodicals
Immunohematology -- Periodicals
Immunopathology -- Periodicals
615.39 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1423-0410 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=vox ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/vox.12259 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0042-9007
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9258.700000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3219.xml