Ark or park: the need to predict relative effectiveness of ex situ and in situ conservation before attempting captive breeding. Issue 4 (5th June 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dolman, Paul M.; Collar, Nigel J.; Scotland, Keith M.; Burnside, Robert. J.; Bode, Michael
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied ecology. Volume 52:Issue 4(2015)
• Page Start: 841
• Page End: 850
• Publication Date: 2015-06-05
• Subjects: Agriculture -- Periodicals; Biology, Economic -- Periodicals; Agricultural ecology -- Periodicals; Applied ecology -- Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12449
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-8901

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="jpe12449-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <p> <list id="jpe12449-list-0001" list-type="order"> <list-item> <p>When species face extinction, captive breeding may be appropriate. However, captive breeding may be unsuccessful, while reducing motivation and resources for <italic>in situ</italic> conservation and impacting wild source populations. Despite such risks, decisions are generally taken without rigorous evaluation. We develop an individual‐based, stochastic population model to evaluate the potential effectiveness of captive‐breeding and release programmes, illustrated by the critically endangered <italic>Ardeotis nigriceps</italic> Vigors great Indian bustard.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>The model was parameterized from a comprehensive review of captive breeding and wild demography of large bustards. To handle uncertainty in the standards of captive‐breeding performance that may be achieved, we explored four scenarios of programme quality: 'full range' (parameters sampled across the observed range), 'below average', 'above average' and 'best possible' (performance observed in exemplary breeding programmes). Results are evaluated examining: (i) the probability of captive population extirpation within 50 years and (ii) numbers of adult females subsequently established in the wild following release, compared to an alternative strategy of <italic>in situ</italic> conservation without attempting captive breeding.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>Successful implementation of captive breeding, involving permanent retention of 20 breeding females and release of surplus juveniles, required collection of many wild eggs and consistent 'best possible' performance across all aspects of the programme. Under 'full‐range' and 'above‐average' scenarios, captive population extirpation probabilities were 73–88% and 23–51% respectively, depending on egg collection rates.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>Although most (73–92%) 'best possible' programmes supported releases, re‐establishment of free‐living adults also required effective <italic>in situ</italic> conservation. Incremental implementation of effective conservation measures over the initial 10 years resulted in more free‐living adults within 35 years if eggs were left in the wild without attempting captive breeding.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p> <italic>Synthesis and applications</italic>. For the great Indian bustard <italic>Ardeotis nigriceps</italic>, rapid implementation of <italic>in situ</italic> conservation offers a better chance to avoid extinction than captive breeding. Demographic modelling of threatened species should be used to examine whether captive breeding will bring net benefits to conservation programmes.</p> </list-item> </list> </p> </abstract>