Applying a random encounter model to estimate lion density from camera traps in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Issue 6 (28th May 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cusack, Jeremy J.; Swanson, Alexandra; Coulson, Tim; Packer, Craig; Carbone, Chris; Dickman, Amy J.; Kosmala, Margaret; Lintott, Chris; Rowcliffe, J. Marcus
• Is Part Of: Journal of wildlife management. Volume 79:Issue 6(2015)
• Page Start: 1014
• Page End: 1021
• Publication Date: 2015-05-28
• Subjects: Wildlife management -- Periodicals; Zoology -- Periodicals; 333.954
• DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.902
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-541X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <sec id="jwmg902-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <p>The random encounter model (REM) is a novel method for estimating animal density from camera trap data without the need for individual recognition. It has never been used to estimate the density of large carnivore species, despite these being the focus of most camera trap studies worldwide. In this context, we applied the REM to estimate the density of female lions (<italic>Panthera leo</italic>) from camera traps implemented in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania, comparing estimates to reference values derived from pride census data. More specifically, we attempted to account for bias resulting from non‐random camera placement at lion resting sites under isolated trees by comparing estimates derived from night versus day photographs, between dry and wet seasons, and between habitats that differ in their amount of tree cover. Overall, we recorded 169 and 163 independent photographic events of female lions from 7, 608 and 12, 137 camera trap days carried out in the dry season of 2010 and the wet season of 2011, respectively. Although all REM models considered over‐estimated female lion density, models that considered only night‐time events resulted in estimates that were much less biased relative to those based on all photographic events. We conclude that restricting REM estimation to periods and habitats in which animal movement is more likely to be random with respect to cameras can help reduce bias in estimates of density for female Serengeti lions. We highlight that accurate REM estimates will nonetheless be dependent on reliable measures of average speed of animal movement and camera detection zone dimensions. © 2015 The Wildlife Society.</p> </sec> </abstract>