Automated auditory response detection: Further improvement of the statistical test strategy by using progressive test steps of iteration. (August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cebulla, Mario; Stürzebecher, Ekkehard
• Is Part Of: International journal of audiology. Volume 54:Number 8(2015:Aug.)
• Page Start: 568
• Page End: 572
• Publication Date: 2015-08
• Subjects: Audiology -- Periodicals; Hearing disorders -- Periodicals; Deafness -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Hearing Disorders -- Periodicals; Hearing -- Periodicals; 617.8
• DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1017659
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1499-2027

Abstract

<abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <p> <italic>Objective:</italic> A common testing approach for automated ABR detection is to use a sequential test strategy. Repeated testing increases the error probability for a falsely detected response (Type I error rate). To compensate for this effect, the statistically critical test value must be increased with each test step. The aim of the study was to improve response detection by a reduction of the number of test steps using a progressively increasing test step of iteration, defined here as step width. <italic>Design:</italic> A progressively increasing test step width was tested with and without the table-related testing (adjusting the critical test value to each test step) proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0007">Stürzebecher & Cebulla (2013)</xref>. For this study the same data pool was used. <italic>Study sample:</italic> The investigation was performed on raw EEG data collected during routine clinical measurement of frequency-specific ASSR for hearing threshold assessment. <italic>Results:</italic> The reduction of the test step number combined with a progressive test step width led to a significantly improved response detection. In combination with table-related testing a slight but not significant improvement compared to table-related testing alone was revealed. <italic>Conclusions:</italic> The proposed test strategy can improve the performance of objective hearing threshold assessment and of newborn hearing screening.</p> </abstract>