Identifying spatial variations in glacial catchment erosion with detrital thermochronology. Issue 6 (18th June 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ehlers, Todd A.; Szameitat, Annika; Enkelmann, Eva; Yanites, Brian J.; Woodsworth, Glenn J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 120:Issue 6(2015:Aug.)
• Page Start: 1023
• Page End: 1039
• Publication Date: 2015-06-18
• Subjects: Geomorphology -- Periodicals; 551.3
• DOI: 10.1002/2014JF003432
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-9003

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Understanding the spatial distribution of glacial catchment erosion during glaciation has previously proven difficult due to limited access to the glacier bed. Recent advances in detrital thermochronology provide a new technique to quantify the source elevation of sediment. This approach utilizes the tendency of thermochronometer cooling ages to increase with elevation and provides a sediment tracer for the elevation of erosion. We apply this technique to the Tiedeman Glacier in the heavily glaciated Mount Waddington region, British Columbia. A total of 106 detrital apatite (U‐Th)/He (AHe) and 100 apatite fission track (AFT) single‐grain ages was presented from the modern outwash of the Tiedemann Glacier with catchment elevations between 530 and 3960 m. These data are combined with nine AHe and nine AFT bedrock ages collected from a ~2400 m vertical transect to test the hypotheses that erosion is uniformly or nonuniformly distributed in the catchment. A Monte Carlo sampling model and Kuiper statistical test are used to quantify the elevation range where outwash sediment is sourced. Model results from the AHe data suggest nearly uniform erosion in the catchment, with a preference for sediment being sourced from ~2900 to 2700 m elevation. Ages indicated that the largest source of sediment is near the present‐day ELA. These results demonstrate the utility of AHe detrital thermochronology (and to a lesser degree AFT data) to quantify the distribution of erosion by individual geomorphic processes, as well as some of the limitations of the technique.</p> </abstract>