Changes in Patterns of Species Co‐occurrence across Two Tropical Cloud Forests Differing in Soil Nutrients and Air Temperature. (July 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Long, Wenxing; Xiong, Menghui; Zang, Runguo; Schamp, Brandon S.; Yang, Xiaobo; Ding, Yi; Huang, Yunfeng; Xiang, Yangzhou
• Is Part Of: Biotropica. Volume 47:Number 4(2015:Jul.)
• Page Start: 416
• Page End: 423
• Publication Date: 2015-07
• Subjects: Biotic communities -- Tropics -- Periodicals; Applied ecology -- Tropics -- Periodicals; Biology -- Tropics -- Periodicals; 577.80913
• DOI: 10.1111/btp.12235
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0006-3606

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="btp12235-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Patterns of co‐occurrence of species are increasingly used to examine the contribution of biotic interactions to community assembly. We assessed patterns of co‐occurrence at four scales, in two types of tropical cloud forests in Hainan Island, China (tropical montane evergreen forests, TMEF and tropical dwarf forests, TDF) that varied significantly in soil nutrients and temperature. We tested if the patterns of co‐occurrence changed when we sorted species into classes by abundance and diameter at breast height (dbh). Co‐occurrence differed by forest type and with plot size, with significant species aggregation observed across larger plots in TDF and patterns of species segregation observed in smaller plots in TMEF. Analyses of differential abundance and dbh classes also showed that smaller plots in TMEF tend to have negative co‐occurrence patterns, but larger plots in TDF tend to show patterns of aggregation, suggesting competitive and facilitative interactions. This underscores the scale‐dependence of the processes contributing to community assembly. Furthermore, it is consistent with predictions of the stress gradient hypothesis that facilitation will be most important in biological systems subject to abiotic stress, while competition will be more important in less abiotically stressful habitats. Our results clearly demonstrate that these two types of tropical cloud forest exhibit different co‐occurrence patterns, and that these patterns are scale‐dependent, though independent of plant abundance and size class.</p> </abstract>