The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance venography in the detection of deep venous thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue 8 (August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Abdalla, G.; Fawzi Matuk, R.; Venugopal, V.; Verde, F.; Magnuson, T.H.; Schweitzer, M.A.; Steele, K.E.
• Is Part Of: Clinical radiology. Volume 70:Issue 8(2015)
• Page Start: 858
• Page End: 871
• Publication Date: 2015-08
• Subjects: Medical radiology -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiology -- Periodicals; Societies, Medical -- Periodicals; Medical radiology; Radiotherapy; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.04.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0009-9260

Abstract

<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0010">Aim</title> <p id="abspara0010">To search the literature for further evidence for the use of magnetic resonance venography (MRV) in the detection of suspected DVT and to re-evaluate the accuracy of MRV in the detection of suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT).</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Materials and methods</title> <p id="abspara0015">PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched. Study quality and the risk of bias were evaluated using the QUADAS 2. A random effects meta-analysis including subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Results</title> <p id="abspara0020">The search resulted in 23 observational studies all from academic centres. Sixteen articles were included in the meta-analysis. The summary estimates for MRV as a diagnostic non-invasive tool revealed a sensitivity of 93% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89% to 95%) and specificity of 96% (95% CI: 94% to 97%). The heterogeneity of the studies was high. Inconsistency (I2) for sensitivity and specificity was 80.7% and 77.9%, respectively.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Conclusion</title> <p id="abspara0025">Further studies investigating the use of MRV in the detection of suspected DVT did not offer further evidence to support the replacement of ultrasound with MRV as the first-line investigation. However, MRV may offer an alternative tool in the detection/diagnosis of DVT for whom ultrasound is inadequate or not feasible (such as in the obese patient).</p> </sec> </abstract>