Investigation of Structural Determinants for the Substrate Specificity in the Zinc‐Dependent Alcohol Dehydrogenase CPCR2 from Candida parapsilosis. Issue 10 (10th June 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Loderer, Christoph; Dhoke, Gaurao V.; Davari, Mehdi D.; Kroutil, Wolfgang; Schwaneberg, Ulrich; Bocola, Marco; Ansorge‐Schumacher, Marion B.
• Is Part Of: Chembiochem. Volume 16:Issue 10(2015)
• Page Start: 1512
• Page End: 1519
• Publication Date: 2015-06-10
• Subjects: Biochemistry -- Periodicals; Molecular biology -- Periodicals; Pharmaceutical chemistry -- Periodicals; 572
• DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201500100
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1439-4227

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Zinc‐dependent alcohol dehydrogenases (ADHs) are a class of enzymes applied in different biocatalytic processes ranging from lab to industrial scale. However, one drawback is the limited substrate range, necessitating a whole array of different ADHs for the relevant substrate classes. In this study, we investigated structural determinants of the substrate spectrum in the zinc‐dependent ADH carbonyl reductase 2 from <italic>Candida parapsilosis</italic> (CPCR2), combining methods of mutational analysis with in silico substrate docking. Assigned active site residues were genetically randomized, and the resulting mutant libraries were screened with a selection of challenging carbonyl substrates. Three variants (C57A, W116K, and L119M) with improved activities toward different substrates were detected at neighboring positions in the active site. Thus, all possible combinations of the mutations were generated and characterized for their substrate specificity, yielding several improved variants. The most interesting were a C57A variant, with a 27‐fold increase in specific activity for 4′‐acetamidoacetophenone, and the double mutant CPCR2 B16‐(C57A, L119M), with a 45‐fold improvement in the <italic>k</italic><sub>cat</sub>⋅<italic>K</italic><sub>M</sub><sup>−1</sup> value. The obtained variants were further investigated by in silico docking experiments. The results indicate that the mentioned residues are structural determinants of the substrate specificity of CPCR2, being major players in the definition of the active site. Comparison of these results with closely related enzymes suggests that these might even be transferred to other ADHs.</p> </abstract>