Overcoming challenges to meaningful informed consent for whole genome sequencing in pediatric cancer research. Issue 8 (1st April 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Oberg, Jennifer A.; Glade Bender, Julia L.; Cohn, Elizabeth G.; Morris, Marilyn; Ruiz, Jenny; Chung, Wendy K.; Appelbaum, Paul S.; Kung, Andrew L.; Levine, Jennifer M.
• Is Part Of: Pediatric blood & cancer. Volume 62:Issue 8(2015:Aug.)
• Page Start: 1374
• Page End: 1380
• Publication Date: 2015-04-01
• Subjects: Tumors in children -- Periodicals; Blood -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Cancer in children -- Periodicals; 618.92
• DOI: 10.1002/pbc.25520
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1545-5009

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="pbc25520-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Introducing whole genome sequencing (WGS) into pediatric cancer research at diagnosis poses unique challenges related to informed consent. WGS requires tissue obtained prior to initiating treatment, when families may be overwhelmed with uncertainty and fear. Motivation to participate may be high without fully understanding the range of possible results, including secondary findings. Little is known about parental knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about this type of research.</p> </sec> <sec id="pbc25520-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Procedure</title> <p>A qualitative study was conducted to investigate parental knowledge about genetic concepts and WGS, thoughts about the informed consent process, and preferences for secondary findings. Focus groups were conducted with parents/guardians of children with cancer and semi‐structured interviews were conducted in a control group without cancer. All transcripts were analyzed using content analysis.</p> </sec> <sec id="pbc25520-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Four focus groups included 15 participants; eight semi‐structured interviews included 10 participants. Basic knowledge about genetics was limited to heredity. Some knowledge of genomic analysis was present in 3/15 focus group participants. Major factors related to participation in WGS research were: (i) hope for their child and future children; (ii) no additional procedures; (iii) and protection of privacy. All favored a two‐step consent process, first to store extra tissue from a diagnostic biopsy/resection, followed by consenting to WGS research, one‐to‐two months later. The desire to receive secondary findings was high among both groups, but there were individuals who did not want these results, fearing increased anxiety.</p> </sec> <sec id="pbc25520-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Parents/guardians of children with cancer have limited knowledge about WGS. A two‐step consent process may improve their ability to provide meaningful informed consent. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015;62:1374–1380. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</p> </sec> </abstract>