A Foreign Policy Analysis Perspective on the Domestic Politics Turn in IR Theory1. Issue 2 (17th March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kaarbo, Juliet
• Is Part Of: International studies review. Volume 17:Issue 2(2015:Jun.)
• Page Start: 189
• Page End: 216
• Publication Date: 2015-03-17
• Subjects: International relations -- Periodicals; World politics -- Periodicals; 320.05
• DOI: 10.1111/misr.12213
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1521-9488

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="misr12213-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>Over the last 25 years, there has been a noteworthy turn across major International Relations (IR) theories to include domestic politics and decision‐making factors. Neoclassical realism and variants of liberalism and constructivism, for example, have incorporated state motives, perceptions, domestic political institutions, public opinion, and political culture. These theoretical developments, however, have largely ignored decades of research in foreign policy analysis (FPA) examining how domestic political and decision‐making factors affect actors' choices and policies. This continues the historical disconnect between FPA and "mainstream" IR, resulting in contemporary IR theories that are considerably underdeveloped. This article revisits the reasons for this separation and demonstrates the gaps between IR theory and FPA research. I argue that a distinct FPA perspective, one that is psychologically‐oriented and agent‐based, can serve as a complement, a competitor, and an integrating crucible for the cross‐theoretical turn toward domestic politics and decision making in IR theory.</p> </abstract>