Risk of high‐grade cervical dysplasia and gynaecological malignancies following the cytologic diagnosis of atypical endocervical cells of undetermined significance: A retrospective study of a state‐wide screening population in Western Australia. (5th June 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Risk of high‐grade cervical dysplasia and gynaecological malignancies following the cytologic diagnosis of atypical endocervical cells of undetermined significance: A retrospective study of a state‐wide screening population in Western Australia. (5th June 2015)
- Main Title:
- Risk of high‐grade cervical dysplasia and gynaecological malignancies following the cytologic diagnosis of atypical endocervical cells of undetermined significance: A retrospective study of a state‐wide screening population in Western Australia
- Authors:
- Munro, Aime
Williams, Vincent
Semmens, James
Leung, Yee
Stewart, Colin J.R.
Codde, Jim
Spilsbury, Katrina
Steel, Nerida
Cohen, Paul
O'leary, Peter - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="ajo12336-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="ajo12336-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>In 2006, Australia adopted a revised cervical cytology terminology system, known as the Australian Modified Bethesda System (AMBS). One substantial change in the AMBS was the introduction of the diagnostic category of atypical endocervical cells (AEC) of undetermined significance.</p> </sec> <sec id="ajo12336-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of histologically confirmed high‐grade cervical dysplasia (cervical intra‐epithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2 and 3 and adenocarcinoma <italic>in situ</italic> (ACIS)), cervical carcinoma and endometrial carcinoma in women presenting with AEC on cervical cytology.</p> </sec> <sec id="ajo12336-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A seven‐year retrospective study examining clinical outcomes of women with AEC on a screening cervical smear. Cytology and histology results were extracted from the Western Australia Cervical Screening Registry, and time‐to‐event analysis was used to predict the odds of having or developing <italic>in situ</italic> and invasive neoplasia.</p> </sec> <sec id="ajo12336-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>AEC was reported in index smears from 0.093% (584/622754) women during the study period. No follow‐up was available in<abstract abstract-type="main" id="ajo12336-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="ajo12336-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>In 2006, Australia adopted a revised cervical cytology terminology system, known as the Australian Modified Bethesda System (AMBS). One substantial change in the AMBS was the introduction of the diagnostic category of atypical endocervical cells (AEC) of undetermined significance.</p> </sec> <sec id="ajo12336-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of histologically confirmed high‐grade cervical dysplasia (cervical intra‐epithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2 and 3 and adenocarcinoma <italic>in situ</italic> (ACIS)), cervical carcinoma and endometrial carcinoma in women presenting with AEC on cervical cytology.</p> </sec> <sec id="ajo12336-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A seven‐year retrospective study examining clinical outcomes of women with AEC on a screening cervical smear. Cytology and histology results were extracted from the Western Australia Cervical Screening Registry, and time‐to‐event analysis was used to predict the odds of having or developing <italic>in situ</italic> and invasive neoplasia.</p> </sec> <sec id="ajo12336-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>AEC was reported in index smears from 0.093% (584/622754) women during the study period. No follow‐up was available in 35 AEC cases. Sixty‐five of the remaining 549 women (11.8%) had, or developed, high‐grade cervical dysplasia within five years of their index AEC diagnosis. Endometrial cancer was diagnosed in 21 women and cervical cancer in four women during the follow‐up period.</p> </sec> <sec id="ajo12336-sec-0005" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Cytologic demonstration of AEC requires careful gynaecologic evaluation, particularly in younger women who may be found to have either high‐grade squamous (CIN) or glandular (ACIS) lesions, while in older women, the possibility of endometrial neoplasia needs to be considered.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Australian and New Zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. Volume 55:Number 3(2015)
- Journal:
- Australian and New Zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
- Issue:
- Volume 55:Number 3(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 55, Issue 3 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 55
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0055-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 268
- Page End:
- 273
- Publication Date:
- 2015-06-05
- Subjects:
- Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Gynecology -- Periodicals
618.05 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1479-828X ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/loi/ajo ↗
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118501330/home ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/ajo.12336 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0004-8666
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1796.890000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4100.xml