Effects of humic stress on the zooplankton from clear and DOC‐rich lakes. (24th March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Robidoux, Marilyne; del Giorgio, Paul; Derry, Alison
• Is Part Of: Freshwater biology. Volume 60:Number 7(2015:Jul.)
• Page Start: 1263
• Page End: 1278
• Publication Date: 2015-03-24
• Subjects: Freshwater biology -- Periodicals; Biologie d'eau douce -- Périodiques; 577.605
• DOI: 10.1111/fwb.12560
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0046-5070

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="fwb12560-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <p> <list id="fwb12560-list-0001" list-type="order"> <list-item> <p>Humic stress is associated with the widespread and ongoing browning of lakes. Natural landscape gradients in dissolved organic carbon (DOC) potentially result in aquatic communities with different tolerances to humic substances and thus expected contrasting responses to further lake browning.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>If zooplanktonic species are adapted to different background concentrations of DOC, then we expected that the zooplankton from naturally DOC‐rich lakes would maintain higher diversity, biomass and overall density in the face of experimental browning than the zooplankton from DOC‐poor lakes. We tested this hypothesis in a common‐garden experiment by exposing, in enclosures, zooplankton from replicate DOC‐rich and DOC‐poor source lakes to simulated browning and to clear water.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>We conducted a 2 × 2 × 3 factorial‐design field transplant experiment with zooplankton from replicate DOC‐rich (>8.5 mg L<sup>−1</sup>) and DOC‐poor (<3.5 mg L<sup>−1</sup>) lakes (Québec, Canada) over eight weeks. There were two fixed effects: water treatment (brown or clear water) and zooplankton source (from DOC‐rich or DOC‐poor lakes). Lake source was included as a random variable in the model for the response of copepod body size in the enclosures. A substance derived from peat, 'SuperHume', was used as a source of DOC.</p> </list-item> <list-item> <p>The diversity, biomass and total density of zooplankton from DOC‐rich and DOC‐poor lakes did not differ upon experimental addition of further DOC. This was despite the presence of different copepod body size phenotypes between source lakes that could have potentially caused different community responses: several dominant species of copepods (<italic>Cyclops scutifer</italic>, <italic> Leptodiaptomus minutus</italic> and <italic>Tropocyclops prasinus mexicanus</italic>) had a larger mean population body size in DOC‐rich source lakes than in DOC‐poor source lakes. Our findings suggest that the zooplankton from DOC‐rich lakes does neither better nor worse than zooplankton from DOC‐poor lakes when faced with browning from a humic stressor.</p> </list-item> </list> </p> </abstract>