Preliminary results using a newly developed projection method to visualize vascular anatomy prior to DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Issue 3 (March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hummelink, S.; Hameeteman, M.; Hoogeveen, Y.; Slump, C.H.; Ulrich, D.J.O.; Schultze Kool, L.J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. Volume 68:Issue 3(2015:Mar.)
• Page Start: 390
• Page End: 394
• Publication Date: 2015-03
• Subjects: Surgery, Plastic -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 617.9505
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.11.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1748-6815

Abstract

<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Summary</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Introduction</title> <p id="abspara0010">In a deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction, computed tomography angiography (CTA) is currently considered as the gold standard in preoperative imaging for this procedure. Unidirectional Doppler ultrasound (US) is frequently used; however, this method does not distinguish the main axial vessels from perforator arteries at the height of the fascia, it has a limited penetration depth, and it cannot assess the branching patterns of the deep inferior arteries. A new method and system were developed, which consisted of a video projector preoperatively displaying the location and intramuscular course of the artery perforators and subcutaneous branching on the patient's abdomen.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Method</title> <p id="abspara0015">All patients (<italic>n</italic> = 9) underwent a standard protocol: a preoperative CTA was performed and the DIEPs were localized using a unidirectional Doppler probe. In addition, a three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the perforator locations based on CTA was projected on the abdomen of the patients. All projected perforator locations were assessed using a unidirectional Doppler probe. The intraoperative results were collected for comparison.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Results</title> <p id="abspara0020">A total of 88 locations were marked with the use of unidirectional Doppler and a total of 100 perforators were projected (<italic>p</italic> = 0.38). In 98 out of 100 projected perforator locations, a Doppler signal was audible. The intraoperative results demonstrate that 19 out of 34 transplanted perforators were correctly identified with unidirectional Doppler (56.9% ± 31.4%), where the projection method properly revealed 29 locations (84.3% ± 25.8%) (<italic>p</italic> = 0.030).</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0030">Conclusion</title> <p id="abspara0025">The projection method is not only capable of providing more information and identifying more perforators used for transplantation than unidirectional Doppler probing but also more accurate in pointing out the corresponding perforator found intraoperatively.</p> </sec> </abstract>