Protection against muscle damage induced by electrical stimulation: efficiency of a preconditioning programme. (29th April 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vanderthommen, Marc; Chamayou, Remy; Demoulin, Christophe; Crielaard, Jean‐Michel; Croisier, Jean‐Louis
• Is Part Of: Clinical physiology and functional imaging. Volume 35:Number 4(2015:Jul.)
• Page Start: 267
• Page End: 274
• Publication Date: 2014-04-29
• Subjects: Physiology, Pathological -- Periodicals; Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; 612
• DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12160
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1475-0961

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="cpf12160-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <sec id="cpf12160-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Purpose</title> <p>The aim of this study was to explore the efficiency of a preconditioning programme composed of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in the protection against muscle damage induced by a subsequent bout of NMES.</p> </sec> <sec id="cpf12160-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Sixteen male volunteers were split up into a control group (CG;<italic> n</italic> = 8) and a preconditioned group (PCG;<italic> n</italic> = 8). Both groups attended two NMES bouts (test 1 and test 2) spaced 5 weeks apart. Each one consisted in 100 quadriceps contractions and 100 hamstrings contractions. PCG attended five additional progressive NMES sessions between test 1 and test 2. The outcome measures were the changes in muscle soreness [0–10 pain score on visual analogue pain scale (VAS)], muscle flexibility and serum creatine kinase (CK) activity; they were assessed before (pre‐T1) and after (post‐T1) test 1 and before (pre‐T2) and after (post‐T2) test 2.</p> </sec> <sec id="cpf12160-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Damage markers increased similarly in both groups after test 1 (at post‐T1, VAS scores = 4·18 ± 2 and 4·43 ± 1·56 cm in CG and PCG, respectively; CK activity = 2307 ± 3774 and 1671 ± 1790 IU l<sup>−1</sup> in CG and PCG, respectively). Compared with test 1, these damage markers were reduced after test 2 in CG (at post‐T2, VAS score = 2·68 ± 1·27 cm and CK activity = 218 ± 72 IU l<sup>−1</sup>). Muscle soreness was further reduced after test 2 in PCG (VAS score = 0·37 ± 0·74 cm).</p> </sec> <sec id="cpf12160-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>A protective effect against muscle damage can be obtained after only one NMES bout, and an additional protective effect can be induced by a preconditioning programme.</p> </sec> </abstract>