Screening for predictors of adverse outcome in onco-geriatric surgical patients: A multicenter prospective cohort study. Issue 7 (July 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Screening for predictors of adverse outcome in onco-geriatric surgical patients: A multicenter prospective cohort study. Issue 7 (July 2015)
- Main Title:
- Screening for predictors of adverse outcome in onco-geriatric surgical patients: A multicenter prospective cohort study
- Authors:
- Huisman, M.G.
Audisio, R.A.
Ugolini, G.
Montroni, I.
Vigano, A.
Spiliotis, J.
Stabilini, C.
de Liguori Carino, N.
Farinella, E.
Stanojevic, G.
Veering, B.T.
Reed, M.W.
Somasundar, P.S.
de Bock, G.H.
van Leeuwen, B.L. - Abstract:
- <abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Aims</title> <p id="abspara0010">The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive ability of screening tools regarding the occurrence of major postoperative complications in onco-geriatric surgical patients and to propose a scoring system.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Methods</title> <p id="abspara0015">328 patients ≥70 years undergoing surgery for solid tumors were prospectively recruited. Preoperatively, twelve screening tools were administered. Primary endpoint was the incidence of major complications within 30 days. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using logistic regression. A scoring system was derived from multivariate logistic regression analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was applied to evaluate model performance.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Results</title> <p id="abspara0020">At a median age of 76 years, 61 patients (18.6%) experienced major complications. In multivariate analysis, Timed Up and Go (TUG), ASA-classification and Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) were predictors of major complications (TUG<sub>&gt;20</sub> OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1–8.6; ASA<sub>≥3</sub> OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.2–6.3; NRS<sub>impaired</sub> OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.6–6.8). The scoring system, including TUG, ASA, NRS, gender and type of surgery, showed good accuracy<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Aims</title> <p id="abspara0010">The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive ability of screening tools regarding the occurrence of major postoperative complications in onco-geriatric surgical patients and to propose a scoring system.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Methods</title> <p id="abspara0015">328 patients ≥70 years undergoing surgery for solid tumors were prospectively recruited. Preoperatively, twelve screening tools were administered. Primary endpoint was the incidence of major complications within 30 days. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using logistic regression. A scoring system was derived from multivariate logistic regression analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was applied to evaluate model performance.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Results</title> <p id="abspara0020">At a median age of 76 years, 61 patients (18.6%) experienced major complications. In multivariate analysis, Timed Up and Go (TUG), ASA-classification and Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) were predictors of major complications (TUG<sub>&gt;20</sub> OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.1–8.6; ASA<sub>≥3</sub> OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.2–6.3; NRS<sub>impaired</sub> OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.6–6.8). The scoring system, including TUG, ASA, NRS, gender and type of surgery, showed good accuracy (AUC: 0.81, 95% CI 0.75–0.86). The negative predictive value with a cut-off point &gt;8 was 93.8% and the positive predictive value was 40.3%.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0030">Conclusions</title> <p id="abspara0025">A substantial number of patients experience major postoperative complications. TUG, ASA and NRS are screening tools predictive of the occurrence of major postoperative complications and, together with gender and type of surgery, compose a good scoring system.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of surgical oncology. Volume 41:Issue 7(2015:Jul.)
- Journal:
- European journal of surgical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 41:Issue 7(2015:Jul.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 41, Issue 7 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 41
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0041-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- 844
- Page End:
- 851
- Publication Date:
- 2015-07
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- surgery -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Oncologie
Chirurgie (geneeskunde)
Electronic journals
Electronic journals -- Sciences
Electronic journals -- Medicine
Electronic journals
616.994059005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.ejso.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/0720048X ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0748-7983;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com/cgi-bin/links/toc/ejso ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.02.018 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0748-7983
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.745500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3569.xml