Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer. Issue 2 (May 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer. Issue 2 (May 2015)
- Main Title:
- Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in esophageal cancer
- Authors:
- van Rossum, Peter S.N.
van Lier, Astrid L.H.M.W.
van Vulpen, Marco
Reerink, Onne
Lagendijk, Jan J.W.
Lin, Steven H.
van Hillegersberg, Richard
Ruurda, Jelle P.
Meijer, Gert J.
Lips, Irene M. - Abstract:
- <abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="ab005"> <title id="st005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st010">Purpose</title> <p id="sp0005">To explore the value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for the prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in esophageal cancer.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st015">Material and methods</title> <p id="sp0010">In 20 patients receiving nCRT for esophageal cancer DW-MRI scanning was performed before nCRT, after 8–13 fractions, and before surgery. The median tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was determined at these three time points. The predictive potential of initial tumor ADC, and change in ADC (ΔADC) during and after treatment for pathologic complete response (pathCR) and good response were assessed. Good response was defined as pathCR or near-pathCR (tumor regression grade [TRG] 1 or 2).</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st020">Results</title> <p id="sp0015">A pathCR after nCRT was found in 4 of 20 patients (20%), and 8 patients (40%) showed a good response to nCRT. The ΔADC<sub>during</sub> was significantly higher in pathCR vs. non-pathCR patients (34.6% ± 10.7% [mean ± SD] vs. 14.0% ± 13.1%, <italic>p</italic> = 0.016), as well as in good vs. poor responders (30.5% ± 8.3% vs. 9.5% ± 12.5%, <italic>p</italic> = 0.002). The ΔADC<sub>during</sub> was predictive of residual cancer at a threshold of 29% (sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 75%, PPV of 94%, and NPV of 100%),<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="ab005"> <title id="st005">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="st010">Purpose</title> <p id="sp0005">To explore the value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) for the prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in esophageal cancer.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st015">Material and methods</title> <p id="sp0010">In 20 patients receiving nCRT for esophageal cancer DW-MRI scanning was performed before nCRT, after 8–13 fractions, and before surgery. The median tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was determined at these three time points. The predictive potential of initial tumor ADC, and change in ADC (ΔADC) during and after treatment for pathologic complete response (pathCR) and good response were assessed. Good response was defined as pathCR or near-pathCR (tumor regression grade [TRG] 1 or 2).</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st020">Results</title> <p id="sp0015">A pathCR after nCRT was found in 4 of 20 patients (20%), and 8 patients (40%) showed a good response to nCRT. The ΔADC<sub>during</sub> was significantly higher in pathCR vs. non-pathCR patients (34.6% ± 10.7% [mean ± SD] vs. 14.0% ± 13.1%, <italic>p</italic> = 0.016), as well as in good vs. poor responders (30.5% ± 8.3% vs. 9.5% ± 12.5%, <italic>p</italic> = 0.002). The ΔADC<sub>during</sub> was predictive of residual cancer at a threshold of 29% (sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 75%, PPV of 94%, and NPV of 100%), and for poor pathologic response at a threshold of 21% (sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, and NPV of 80%).</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="st025">Conclusions</title> <p id="sp0020">In this exploratory study, the treatment-induced change in ADC during the first 2–3 weeks of nCRT for esophageal cancer seemed highly predictive of histopathologic response. Larger series are warranted to verify these results.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Radiotherapy and oncology. Volume 115:Issue 2(2015:May)
- Journal:
- Radiotherapy and oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 115:Issue 2(2015:May)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 115, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 115
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0115-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 163
- Page End:
- 170
- Publication Date:
- 2015-05
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Tumors -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiotherapy -- Periodicals
Radiothérapie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Tumeurs -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
616.9940642 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01678140 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/01678140 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/01678140 ↗
http://www.estro.org/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/radiotherapy-and-oncology/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.04.027 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0167-8140
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7240.790000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3856.xml