Well-Defined and Reliable Clinical Outcome Assessments for Pediatric Crohn Disease. Issue 6 (June 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sun, Haihao; Papadopoulos, Elektra J.; Hyams, Jeffrey S.; Griebel, Donna; Lee, Jessica J.; Tomaino, Juli; Mulberg, Andrew E.
• Is Part Of: Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. Volume 60:Issue 6(2015)
• Publication Date: 2015-06
• Subjects: Children -- Nutrition -- Periodicals; Pediatric gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Infants -- Nutrition -- Periodicals; Nutrition disorders in children -- Periodicals; Child Nutrition -- Periodicals; Digestive System -- growth & development -- Periodicals; Gastrointestinal Diseases -- Periodicals; Infant Nutrition -- Periodicals; Nutrition Disorders -- Periodicals; Child; 618.923
• DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000793
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-2116

Abstract

<abstract> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <sec> <title>Objectives:</title> <p>The aim of the present study was to identify areas for further development of clinical outcome assessment (COA) in pediatric Crohn disease (CD).</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Methods:</title> <p>The study analyzed the measurement properties of all existing COA tools for pediatric CD in literature and published registration trials of approved drugs for pediatric CD based on criteria described in Food and Drug Administration guidance for patient-reported outcome (PRO) development.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results:</title> <p>The Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) and its derivatives (abbreviated, short, modified, and weighted PCDAIs) were reviewed. The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI), designed for adult patients, have been adapted for use in a few pediatric CD studies. The use of PCDAI as an endpoint in Remicade and Humira trials led to the Food and Drug Administration–approved indication in pediatric CD. Common issues in measurement properties of COA tools included the absence of direct patient or caregivers' input to generate the items measuring signs and symptoms; absence of evidence demonstrating correlation with clinically relevant inflammation observed with endoscopic measures; lack of standardization in measurement, age-appropriate interviewer script, and response rating criteria for the physician interviewer.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusions:</title> <p>Available evidence indicates that CDAI, HBI, and 5 versions of the PCDAI lack adequate measurement properties for use as a primary endpoint for phase 3 trials intended to support approval of products intended to treat pediatric CD. In order to facilitate pediatric drug development, a well-defined, reliable, sensitive, and globally recognized PRO that measures signs and symptoms in children with CD and that can be used in conjunction with endoscopy-based endpoints and/or biomarkers is sorely needed.</p> </sec> </abstract>