Impact of a Fast-track Esophagectomy Protocol on Esophageal Cancer Patient Outcomes and Hospital Charges. Issue 6 (June 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Impact of a Fast-track Esophagectomy Protocol on Esophageal Cancer Patient Outcomes and Hospital Charges. Issue 6 (June 2015)
- Main Title:
- Impact of a Fast-track Esophagectomy Protocol on Esophageal Cancer Patient Outcomes and Hospital Charges
- Authors:
- Shewale, Jitesh B.
Correa, Arlene M.
Baker, Carla M.
Villafane-Ferriol, Nicole
Hofstetter, Wayne L.
Jordan, Victoria S.
Kehlet, Henrik
Lewis, Katie M.
Mehran, Reza J.
Summers, Barbara L.
Schaub, Diane
Wilks, Sonia A.
Swisher, Stephen G. - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Objective:</title> <p>To evaluate the effects of a fast-track esophagectomy protocol (FTEP) on esophageal cancer patients' safety, length of hospital stay (LOS), and hospital charges.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Background:</title> <p>FTEP involved transferring patients to the telemetry unit instead of the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) after esophagectomy.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Methods:</title> <p>We retrospectively reviewed 708 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for primary esophageal cancer during the 4 years before (group A; 322 patients) or 4 years after (group B; 386 patients) the institution of an FTEP. Postoperative morbidity and mortality, LOS, and hospital charges were reviewed.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results</title> <p>: Compared with group A, group B had significantly shorter median LOS (12 days vs 8 days; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001); lower mean numbers of SICU days (4.5 days vs 1.2 days; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001) and telemetry days (12.7 days vs 9.7 days; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001); and lower rates of atrial arrhythmia (27% vs 19%; <italic>P</italic> = 0.013) and pulmonary complications (27% vs 20%; <italic>P</italic> = 0.016). Multivariable analysis revealed FTEP to be associated with shorter LOS (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001) even after adjustment for predictors like tumor histology and location. FTEP was also associated with a lower rate of pulmonary<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Objective:</title> <p>To evaluate the effects of a fast-track esophagectomy protocol (FTEP) on esophageal cancer patients' safety, length of hospital stay (LOS), and hospital charges.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Background:</title> <p>FTEP involved transferring patients to the telemetry unit instead of the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) after esophagectomy.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Methods:</title> <p>We retrospectively reviewed 708 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy for primary esophageal cancer during the 4 years before (group A; 322 patients) or 4 years after (group B; 386 patients) the institution of an FTEP. Postoperative morbidity and mortality, LOS, and hospital charges were reviewed.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results</title> <p>: Compared with group A, group B had significantly shorter median LOS (12 days vs 8 days; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001); lower mean numbers of SICU days (4.5 days vs 1.2 days; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001) and telemetry days (12.7 days vs 9.7 days; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001); and lower rates of atrial arrhythmia (27% vs 19%; <italic>P</italic> = 0.013) and pulmonary complications (27% vs 20%; <italic>P</italic> = 0.016). Multivariable analysis revealed FTEP to be associated with shorter LOS (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001) even after adjustment for predictors like tumor histology and location. FTEP was also associated with a lower rate of pulmonary complications (odds ratio = 0.655; 95% confidence interval = 0.456, 0.942; <italic>P</italic> = 0.022). In addition, the median hospital charges associated with primary admission and readmission within 90 days for group B ($65, 649) were lower than that for group A ($79, 117; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001).</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusions:</title> <p>These findings suggest that an FTEP reduces patients' LOS, perioperative morbidity, and hospital charges.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of surgery. Volume 261:Issue 6(2015:Jun.)
- Journal:
- Annals of surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 261:Issue 6(2015:Jun.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 261, Issue 6 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 261
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0261-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-06
- Subjects:
- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.annalsofsurgery.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000971 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-4932
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1044.500000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3692.xml