Experiencing archives at universities. Issue 2 (8th June 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wakimoto, Diana K.; Bruce, Christine Susan
• Is Part Of: Reference services review. Volume 43:Issue 2(2015)
• Page Start: 182
• Page End: 198
• Publication Date: 2015-06-08
• Subjects: Reference books -- Bibliography -- Periodicals; Reference services (Libraries) -- Periodicals; 025.52
• DOI: 10.1108/RSR-07-2014-0025
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0090-7324

Abstract

<abstract> <title> <x content-type="archive" xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Purpose</title> <p> – This paper aims to explore the varying ways in which academic archivists in the USA experience archives, how these experiences compare to those of academic librarians and how we can use these findings to improve communication and collaboration. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Design/methodology/approach</title> <p> – Using a phenomenographic research approach, academic archivists were interviewed and the transcripts were examined to develop categories reflecting varying experiences. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Findings</title> <p> – There are three different ways of experiencing archives: as organizational records, as archival enterprise and as connection. The connection category is a more complex way of experiencing archives as it incorporates the aspects of the other two categories as well as the awareness of archives connecting people to their histories. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Research limitations/implications</title> <p> – This study is limited to academic archivists in the USA. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Practical implications</title> <p> – Understanding that there are different ways of experiencing archives means that information professionals should clarify their definitions of before beginning collaborative projects. Also, by understanding these varying experiences, information professions should be able to communicate and engage more fully with each other and their users in projects and programs that leverage archival collections. </p> </sec> <sec> <title content-type="abstract-heading">Originality/value</title> <p> – This is the first study to use phenomenography to investigate archivists' experiences of archives. This understanding of the lived experience of archivists, combined with understanding how librarians experience archives, should enable better communication and ultimately collaboration between the two professions.</p> </sec> </abstract>