Genomics for Nursing Education and Practice: Measuring Competency. Issue 3 (June 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Anderson, Gwen; Alt‐White, Anna C.; Schaa, Kendra L.; Boyd, Andrea M.; Kasper, Christine E.
• Is Part Of: Worldviews on evidence-based nursing. Volume 12:Issue 3(2015)
• Page Start: 165
• Page End: 175
• Publication Date: 2015-06
• Subjects: Evidence-based nursing -- Periodicals; 610.7
• DOI: 10.1111/wvn.12096
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1545-102X

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>ABSTRACT</title> <sec id="wvn12096-sec-0010" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Nurses lack genome literacy, skill, and self‐confidence in applying genomics to health care. Standardized curricula and evaluation tools are needed for wide spread uptake and application of genome science in nursing education, practice, and research.</p> </sec> <sec id="wvn12096-sec-0020" sec-type="section"> <title>Aim</title> <p>To determine whether psychometrically robust survey instruments exist to assess knowledge, skills, attitudes, and self‐confidence in applying genomic nursing competency among students and registered nurses.</p> </sec> <sec id="wvn12096-sec-0030" sec-type="section"> <title>Design</title> <p>Psychometric systematic review.</p> </sec> <sec id="wvn12096-sec-0040" sec-type="section"> <title>Data Sources</title> <p>Medline, CINAHL, Academic Search Elite, Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations were searched from 1995 to 2014, with an English language restriction.</p> </sec> <sec id="wvn12096-sec-0050" sec-type="section"> <title>Procedures</title> <p>Critical analysis of the study elements and psychometric attributes was conducted after data were abstracted into analysis and synthesis tables. The synthesis assessed the design, methods, and measurement properties with a focus on reliability and validity using 16 criteria on a 4‐point grading scale.</p> </sec> <sec id="wvn12096-sec-0060" sec-type="section"> <title>Findings</title> <p>Twelve studies were included in a detailed review that focused on assessment of genomic nursing core competencies. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. In terms of psychometric quality of the instruments, one study scored high, two moderate, two low, and one very low.</p> </sec> <sec id="wvn12096-sec-0070" sec-type="section"> <title>Linking Evidence to Action</title> <p>Most instruments assess self‐perceived rather than objectively assessed competency. The highest quality instrument lacks clinical application. Knowledge‐focused test questions based on up‐to‐date genome science that are relevant to practice need to be developed.</p> </sec> </abstract>