Postoperative outcome after oesophagectomy for cancer: Nutritional status is the missing ring in the current prognostic scores. Issue 6 (June 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Postoperative outcome after oesophagectomy for cancer: Nutritional status is the missing ring in the current prognostic scores. Issue 6 (June 2015)
- Main Title:
- Postoperative outcome after oesophagectomy for cancer: Nutritional status is the missing ring in the current prognostic scores
- Authors:
- Filip, B.
Scarpa, M.
Cavallin, F.
Cagol, M.
Alfieri, R.
Saadeh, L.
Ancona, E.
Castoro, C. - Abstract:
- <abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Background</title> <p id="abspara0010">Several prognostic scores were designed in order to estimate the risk of postoperative adverse events. None of them includes a component directly associated to the nutritional status. The aims of the study were the evaluation of performance of risk-adjusted models for early outcomes after oesophagectomy and to develop a score for severe complication prediction with special consideration regarding nutritional status.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Methods</title> <p id="abspara0015">A comparison of POSSUM and Charlson score and their derivates, ASA, Lagarde score and nutritional index (PNI) was performed on 167 patients undergoing oesophagectomy for cancer. A logistic regression model was also estimated to obtain a new prognostic score for severe morbidity prediction.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Results</title> <p id="abspara0020">Overall morbidity was 35.3% (59 cases), severe complications (grade III–V of Clavien–Dindo classification) occurred in 20 cases. Discrimination was poor for all the scores. Multivariable analysis identified pulse, connective tissue disease, PNI and potassium as independent predictors of severe morbidity. This model showed good discrimination and calibration. Internal validation using standard bootstrapping techniques confirmed the good performance.</p><abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Background</title> <p id="abspara0010">Several prognostic scores were designed in order to estimate the risk of postoperative adverse events. None of them includes a component directly associated to the nutritional status. The aims of the study were the evaluation of performance of risk-adjusted models for early outcomes after oesophagectomy and to develop a score for severe complication prediction with special consideration regarding nutritional status.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Methods</title> <p id="abspara0015">A comparison of POSSUM and Charlson score and their derivates, ASA, Lagarde score and nutritional index (PNI) was performed on 167 patients undergoing oesophagectomy for cancer. A logistic regression model was also estimated to obtain a new prognostic score for severe morbidity prediction.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Results</title> <p id="abspara0020">Overall morbidity was 35.3% (59 cases), severe complications (grade III–V of Clavien–Dindo classification) occurred in 20 cases. Discrimination was poor for all the scores. Multivariable analysis identified pulse, connective tissue disease, PNI and potassium as independent predictors of severe morbidity. This model showed good discrimination and calibration. Internal validation using standard bootstrapping techniques confirmed the good performance.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0030">Conclusions</title> <p id="abspara0025">Nutrition could be an independent risk factor for major complications and a nutritional status coefficient could be included in current prognostic scores to improve risk estimation of major postoperative complications after oesophagectomy for cancer.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of surgical oncology. Volume 41:Issue 6(2015:Jun.)
- Journal:
- European journal of surgical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 41:Issue 6(2015:Jun.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 41, Issue 6 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 41
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0041-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 787
- Page End:
- 794
- Publication Date:
- 2015-06
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- surgery -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Oncologie
Chirurgie (geneeskunde)
Electronic journals
Electronic journals -- Sciences
Electronic journals -- Medicine
Electronic journals
616.994059005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.ejso.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/0720048X ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0748-7983;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com/cgi-bin/links/toc/ejso ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.02.014 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0748-7983
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.745500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3357.xml