The effect of diverting stoma on postoperative morbidity after low anterior resection for rectal cancer in patients treated within an ERAS program. Issue 6 (June 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The effect of diverting stoma on postoperative morbidity after low anterior resection for rectal cancer in patients treated within an ERAS program. Issue 6 (June 2015)
- Main Title:
- The effect of diverting stoma on postoperative morbidity after low anterior resection for rectal cancer in patients treated within an ERAS program
- Authors:
- Anderin, K.
Gustafsson, U.O.
Thorell, A.
Nygren, J. - Abstract:
- <abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Background</title> <p id="abspara0010">Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication after low anterior resection (LAR) with total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer. Whether the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)-protocol influences the risk of short-term morbidity in relation to the use of a diverting stoma is unclear.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Methods</title> <p id="abspara0015">Between 2002 and 2011, 287 consecutive patients underwent LAR with TME for rectal cancer at Ersta Hospital, Sweden. All patients were treated according to the ERAS program and thereby included. Between 2002 and 2006 15% had a diverting stoma compared to 91 %, 2007 to 2011.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Results</title> <p id="abspara0020">One hundred and thirty-nine patients were operated with a diverting stoma at primary surgery (S+), 148 patients were not (S−). The groups were comparable regarding pre- and peroperative data and patients' characteristics. Postoperative morbidity within 30 days after surgery (S+ 53% vs. S− 43%) and hospital stay (S+ 11 days vs. S− 9 days) did not differ. AL occurred in 22% of all patients. In a multivariate analysis, no significant difference in AL was found in relation to the use of a diverting stoma (S+ vs. S−, OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.34–1.19). Eleven patients (8%) in the S+ group underwent<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="abs0010"> <title id="sectitle0010">Abstract</title> <sec> <title id="sectitle0015">Background</title> <p id="abspara0010">Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a serious complication after low anterior resection (LAR) with total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer. Whether the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)-protocol influences the risk of short-term morbidity in relation to the use of a diverting stoma is unclear.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0020">Methods</title> <p id="abspara0015">Between 2002 and 2011, 287 consecutive patients underwent LAR with TME for rectal cancer at Ersta Hospital, Sweden. All patients were treated according to the ERAS program and thereby included. Between 2002 and 2006 15% had a diverting stoma compared to 91 %, 2007 to 2011.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0025">Results</title> <p id="abspara0020">One hundred and thirty-nine patients were operated with a diverting stoma at primary surgery (S+), 148 patients were not (S−). The groups were comparable regarding pre- and peroperative data and patients' characteristics. Postoperative morbidity within 30 days after surgery (S+ 53% vs. S− 43%) and hospital stay (S+ 11 days vs. S− 9 days) did not differ. AL occurred in 22% of all patients. In a multivariate analysis, no significant difference in AL was found in relation to the use of a diverting stoma (S+ vs. S−, OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.34–1.19). Eleven patients (8%) in the S+ group underwent relaparotomy versus 22 (15%) in the S− group (p = 0.065). Total overall compliance to the ERAS program was 65%. Patients in S− had faster postoperative recovery.</p> </sec> <sec> <title id="sectitle0030">Conclusion</title> <p id="abspara0025">A diverting stoma did not affect postoperative morbidity in this large cohort of patients undergoing LAR within an ERAS program. However, the routine use of a diverting stoma could be expected to delay postoperative recovery.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of surgical oncology. Volume 41:Issue 6(2015:Jun.)
- Journal:
- European journal of surgical oncology
- Issue:
- Volume 41:Issue 6(2015:Jun.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 41, Issue 6 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 41
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0041-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 724
- Page End:
- 730
- Publication Date:
- 2015-06
- Subjects:
- Oncology -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Medical Oncology -- Periodicals
Neoplasms -- surgery -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques
Cancérologie -- Périodiques
Oncologie
Chirurgie (geneeskunde)
Electronic journals
Electronic journals -- Sciences
Electronic journals -- Medicine
Electronic journals
616.994059005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.ejso.com/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/07487983 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/0720048X ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0748-7983;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com/cgi-bin/links/toc/ejso ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.03.234 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0748-7983
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.745500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3356.xml