Quantifying alosine prey in the diets of marine piscivores in the Gulf of Maine. Issue 6 (5th May 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: McDermott, S. P.; Bransome, N. C.; Sutton, S. E.; Smith, B. E.; Link, J. S.; Miller, T. J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of fish biology. Volume 86:Issue 6(2015)
• Page Start: 1811
• Page End: 1829
• Publication Date: 2015-05-05
• Subjects: Fishes -- Periodicals; Fishes -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 597
• DOI: 10.1111/jfb.12692
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-1112

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="jfb12692-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p id="jfb12692-para-0001">The objectives of this work were to quantify the spatial and temporal distribution of the occurrence of anadromous fishes (alewife <italic>Alosa pseudoharengus</italic>, blueback herring <italic>Alosa aestivalis</italic> and American shad <italic>Alosa sapidissima</italic>) in the stomachs of demersal fishes in coastal waters of the north‐west Atlantic Ocean. Results show that anadromous fishes were detectable and quantifiable in the diets of common marine piscivores for every season sampled. Even though anadromous fishes were not the most abundant prey, they accounted for <italic>c.</italic> 5–10% of the diet by mass for several marine piscivores. Statistical comparisons of these data with fish diet data from a broad‐scale survey of the north‐west Atlantic Ocean indicate that the frequency of this trophic interaction was significantly higher within spatially and temporally focused sampling areas of this study than in the broad‐scale survey. Odds ratios of anadromous predation were as much as 460 times higher in the targeted sampling as compared with the broad‐scale sampling. Analyses indicate that anadromous prey consumption was more concentrated in the near‐coastal waters compared with consumption of a similar, but more widely distributed species, the Atlantic herring <italic>Clupea harengus</italic>. In the context of ecosystem‐based fisheries management, the results suggest that even low‐frequency feeding events may be locally important, and should be incorporated into ecosystem models.</p> </abstract>