Typology of Alcohol Mixed with Energy Drink Consumers: Motivations for Use. (18th May 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Peacock, Amy; Droste, Nicolas; Pennay, Amy; Miller, Peter; Lubman, Dan I.; Bruno, Raimondo
• Is Part Of: Alcoholism. Volume 39:Number 6(2015:Jun.)
• Page Start: 1083
• Page End: 1092
• Publication Date: 2015-05-18
• Subjects: Alcoholism -- Periodicals; Alcoholism -- Periodicals; Alcoolisme; Electronic journals; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.861005
• DOI: 10.1111/acer.12729
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0145-6008

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="acer12729-abs-0001"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="acer12729-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Previous research on alcohol mixed with energy drinks (AmED) has shown that use is typically driven by hedonistic, social, functional, and intoxication‐related motives, with differential associations with alcohol‐related harm across these constructs. There has been no research looking at whether there are subgroups of consumers based on patterns of motivations. Consequently, the aims were to determine the typology of motivations for AmED use among a community sample and to identify correlates of subgroup membership. In addition, we aimed to determine whether this structure of motivations applied to a university student sample.</p> </sec> <sec id="acer12729-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Data were used from an Australian community sample (<italic>n </italic>=<italic> </italic>731) and an Australian university student sample (<italic>n </italic>=<italic> </italic>594) who were identified as AmED consumers when completing an online survey about their alcohol and ED use. Participants reported their level of agreement with 14 motivations for AmED use; latent classes of AmED consumers were identified based on patterns of motivation endorsement using latent class analysis.</p> </sec> <sec id="acer12729-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>A 4‐class model was selected using data from the community sample: (i) <italic>taste consumers</italic> (31%): endorsed pleasurable taste; (ii) <italic>energy‐seeking consumers</italic> (24%): endorsed functional and taste motives; (iii) <italic>hedonistic consumers</italic> (33%): endorse pleasure and sensation‐seeking motives, as well as functional and taste motives; and (iv) <italic>intoxication‐related consumers</italic> (12%): endorsed motives related to feeling in control of intoxication, as well as hedonistic, functional, and taste motives. The consumer subgroups typically did not differ on demographics, other drug use, alcohol and ED use, and AmED risk taking. The patterns of motivations for the 4‐class model were similar for the university student sample.</p> </sec> <sec id="acer12729-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>This study indicated the existence of 4 subgroups of AmED consumers based on their patterns of motivations for AmED use consistently structured across the community and university student sample. These findings lend support to the growing conceptualization of AmED consumers as a heterogeneous group in regard to motivations for use, with a hierarchical and cumulative class order in regard to the number of types of motivation for AmED use. Prospective research may endeavor to link session‐specific motives and outcomes, as it is apparent that primary consumption motives may be fluid between sessions.</p> </sec> </abstract>