Team-based clinical simulation in radiation medicine: value to attitudes and perceptions of interprofessional collaboration. Issue 2 (10th March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gillan, Caitlin; Giuliani, Meredith; Wong, Olive; Harnett, Nicole; Milne, Emily; Moseley, Douglas; Thompson, Robert; Catton, Pamela; Bissonnette, Jean-Pierre
• Is Part Of: Journal of radiotherapy in practice. Volume 14:Issue 2(2014)
• Page Start: 117
• Page End: 125
• Publication Date: 2015-03-10
• Subjects: Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; 615.842005
• DOI: 10.1017/S1460396915000060
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1460-3969

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="normal"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="abs1" sec-type="intro"> <title>Introduction</title> <p>Simulation has been effective for changing attitudes towards team-based competencies in many areas, but its role in teaching interprofessional collaboration (IPC) in radiation medicine (RM) is unknown. This study reports on feasibility and IPC outcomes of a team-based simulation event; 'Radiation Medicine Simulation in Learning Interprofessional Collaborative Experience' (RM SLICE).</p> </sec> <sec id="abs2" sec-type="methods"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Radiation therapy (RTT), medical physics (MP) and radiation oncology (RO) trainees in a single academic department were eligible. Scheduled closure of a modern RM clinic allowed rotation of five high-fidelity cases in three 105-minute timeslots. A pre/post-survey design evaluated learner satisfaction and interprofessional perceptions. Scales included the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS), UWE Entry Level Interprofessional Questionnaire (UWEIQ), Trainee Test of Team Dynamics and Collaborative Behaviours Scale (CBS).</p> </sec> <sec id="abs3" sec-type="results"> <title>Results</title> <p>Twenty-one trainees participated; six ROs (28·57%), six MPs (28·57%) and nine RTTs (42·86%). All cases were conducted, resolved and debriefed within the allotted time. Twenty-one complete sets (100%) of evaluations were returned. Participants reported limited interaction with other professional groups before RM SLICE. Perceptions of team functioning and value of team interaction in 'establishing or improving the care plan' were high for all cases, averaging 8·1/10 and 8·9/10. Average CBS scores were 70·4, 71·9 and 69·5, for the three cases, scores increasing between the first and second case for 13/21 (61·9%) participants. RIPLS and UWEIQ scores reflected positive perceptions both pre- and post-event, averaging 83·5 and 85·2 (RIPLS) and 60·6 and 55·7 (UWEIQ), respectively. For all professions for both scales, the average change in score reflected improved IP perceptions, with agreement between scales for 15/20 (75·0%) participants. Overall, perception of IPC averaged 9·14/10, as did the importance of holding such an event annually.</p> </sec> <sec id="abs4" sec-type="conclusions"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Team-based simulation is feasible in RM and appears to facilitate interprofessional competency-building in high-acuity clinical situations, reflecting positive perceptions of IPC.</p> </sec> </abstract>