Why short‐term biochar application has no yield benefits: evidence from three field‐grown crops. (5th March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jay, C. N.; Fitzgerald, J. D.; Hipps, N. A.; Atkinson, C. J.; Goss, Michael
• Is Part Of: Soil use and management. Volume 31:Number 2(2015:Jun.)
• Page Start: 241
• Page End: 250
• Publication Date: 2015-03-05
• Subjects: Soil management -- Periodicals; 631.4
• DOI: 10.1111/sum.12181
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0266-0032

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="sum12181-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>This study determines the impact of biochar, as a supplement, on soil nutrient availability and yields for three crops within commercial management systems in a temperate environment. Central to the suggestion of biochar benefits is an increase in soil nutrient availability, and here, we test this idea by examining crop nutrient uptake, growth and yields of field‐grown spring barley, strawberry and potato. Biochar produced from <italic>Castanea sativa</italic> wood was incorporated into a sandy loam soil at 0, 20 and 50 t/ha as a supplement to standard crop management practice. Fertilizer was applied normally for each of the three crops. The biochar contained substantial concentrations of Ca, Mg, K, P, but only K occurred at high concentration in water‐soluble analysis. The large concentration of extractable K resulted in a significant increase of extractable K in soil. The increased availability of K in biochar‐treated soil, with the exception of spring barley grain and the leaves of strawberry during the second year, did not induce greater tissue concentrations. In general, biochar application rate had little influence on the tissue concentration of any nutrient, irrespective of crop or sampling date. There was, however, evidence of a biochar‐induced increase in tissue Mo and a decrease in Mn, in strawberry, which could be linked to soil alkalinization as could the reduction in extractable soil P. These experiments show a single rotational application of biochar to soil had no effect on the growth or harvest yield of any of these field‐grown crops. Heavy metal analysis revealed small concentrations in the biochar (i.e. <10 <italic>μ</italic>g/g biochar), with the largest levels for Ni, V and Cu.</p> </abstract>