Ambulatory Electrocardiographic Monitoring between Artifacts and Misinterpretation, Management Errors of Commission and Errors of Omission. Issue 3 (4th November 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Ambulatory Electrocardiographic Monitoring between Artifacts and Misinterpretation, Management Errors of Commission and Errors of Omission. Issue 3 (4th November 2014)
- Main Title:
- Ambulatory Electrocardiographic Monitoring between Artifacts and Misinterpretation, Management Errors of Commission and Errors of Omission
- Authors:
- El‐Sherif, Nabil
Turitto, Gioia - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="anec12222-sec-0010" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>The aim of the study is to contrast the role of conventional ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring (AEM) artifacts with a less emphasized problem with potentially more serious implications, that is, the failure to recognize, and therefore misinterpret, a genuine arrhythmia episode in the AEM recording.</p> </sec> <sec id="anec12222-sec-0020" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>The study material included 500 Holter recordings and 500 recordings from the cardiac telemetry unit.</p> </sec> <sec id="anec12222-sec-0030" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Electrocardiographic (ECG) artifacts were more common in telemetry recordings (5.6%) compared to Holter recordings (4%) for a total of 4.8%. There were 35 examples of misinterpretation of AEM recordings (3.5%). These were significantly more common in telemetry recordings (2.6%) compared to Holter recordings (0.9%). The most common ECG artifacts were examples of pseudo ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT). The majority of misinterpretation (26 of 35 examples) were fast supraventricular tachyarrhythmias with aberrant QRS (including six examples of atrial flutter with periods of 1:1 atrioventricular conduction) that were misdiagnosed as ventricular VT. Other examples were misinterpretation of arrhythmic episodes consistent with sick sinus syndrome,<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="anec12222-sec-0010" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>The aim of the study is to contrast the role of conventional ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring (AEM) artifacts with a less emphasized problem with potentially more serious implications, that is, the failure to recognize, and therefore misinterpret, a genuine arrhythmia episode in the AEM recording.</p> </sec> <sec id="anec12222-sec-0020" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>The study material included 500 Holter recordings and 500 recordings from the cardiac telemetry unit.</p> </sec> <sec id="anec12222-sec-0030" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Electrocardiographic (ECG) artifacts were more common in telemetry recordings (5.6%) compared to Holter recordings (4%) for a total of 4.8%. There were 35 examples of misinterpretation of AEM recordings (3.5%). These were significantly more common in telemetry recordings (2.6%) compared to Holter recordings (0.9%). The most common ECG artifacts were examples of pseudo ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT). The majority of misinterpretation (26 of 35 examples) were fast supraventricular tachyarrhythmias with aberrant QRS (including six examples of atrial flutter with periods of 1:1 atrioventricular conduction) that were misdiagnosed as ventricular VT. Other examples were misinterpretation of arrhythmic episodes consistent with sick sinus syndrome, pacemaker malfunction, and long QT syndrome. Only 5 of 48 examples of AEM artifacts resulted in management errors of commission or errors of omission compared to all 35 examples of misinterpretation.</p> </sec> <sec id="anec12222-sec-0040" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusions</title> <p>Compared to conventional artifacts in AEM, misinterpretation of nonartifactual arrhythmic episodes consistently resulted in management errors. Misinterpretation was significantly more common with telemetry recordings compared to Holter ECG. This highlights the need for more appropriate training of the entire clinical team in charge of the management of the cardiac telemetry unit.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology. Volume 20:Issue 3(2015)
- Journal:
- Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology
- Issue:
- Volume 20:Issue 3(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 20, Issue 3 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0020-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 282
- Page End:
- 289
- Publication Date:
- 2014-11-04
- Subjects:
- Electrocardiography -- Periodicals
Arrhythmia -- Periodicals
616.1207547 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1542-474X ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/anec.12222 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1082-720X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 1043.144000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4368.xml