Using patient flow simulation to improve access at a multidisciplinary sleep centre. (27th November 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pendharkar, Sachin R.; Bischak, Diane P.; Rogers, Paul; Flemons, Ward; Noseworthy, Tom W.
• Is Part Of: Journal of sleep research. Volume 24:Number 3(2015)
• Page Start: 320
• Page End: 327
• Publication Date: 2014-11-27
• Subjects: Sleep -- Periodicals; Sleep disorders -- Periodicals; 612.821
• DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12257
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0962-1105

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" id="jsr12257-abs-0001"> <title>Summary</title> <p>The lack of timely access to diagnosis and treatment for sleep disorders is well described, but little attention has been paid to understanding how multiple system constraints contribute to long waiting times. The objectives of this study were to identify system constraints leading to long waiting times at a multidisciplinary sleep centre, and to use patient flow simulation modelling to test solutions that could improve access. Discrete‐event simulation models of patient flow were constructed using historical data from 150 patients referred to the sleep centre, and used to both examine reasons for access delays and to test alternative system configurations that were predicted by administrators to reduce waiting times. Four possible solutions were modelled and compared with baseline, including addition of capacity to different areas at the sleep centre and elimination of prioritization by urgency. Within the model, adding physician capacity improved time from patient referral to initial physician appointment, but worsened time from polysomnography requisition to test completion, and had no effect on time from patient referral to treatment initiation. Adding respiratory therapist did not improve model performance compared with baseline. Eliminating triage prioritization worsened time to physician assessment and treatment initiation for urgent patients without improving waiting times overall. This study demonstrates that discrete‐event simulation can identify multiple constraints in access‐limited healthcare systems and allow suggested solutions to be tested before implementation. The model of this sleep centre predicted that investments in capacity expansion proposed by administrators would not reduce the time to a clinically meaningful patient outcome.</p> </abstract>