Reference Intervals of Serum Sodium, Potassium, and Chlorine in Chinese Han Population and Comparison of Two ISE Methods. Issue 3 (5th May 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Reference Intervals of Serum Sodium, Potassium, and Chlorine in Chinese Han Population and Comparison of Two ISE Methods. Issue 3 (5th May 2014)
- Main Title:
- Reference Intervals of Serum Sodium, Potassium, and Chlorine in Chinese Han Population and Comparison of Two ISE Methods
- Authors:
- Jia, Keke
Zhang, Chuanbao
Huang, Xianzhang
Wang, Lanlan
Hao, Xiaoke
Mu, Runqing
Pan, Baishen
Zhang, Jie
Chen, Wenxiang
Xu, Ning
Li, Guixing
Ma, Yueyun
Ma, Ming
Guo, Wei
Shang, Hong - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="jcla21755-sec-0010" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Currently there are no reference intervals (RIs) of sodium (Na), potassium (K), and chlorine (Cl) on Chinese population. Two kinds of ion‐selective electrode (ISE) methods were commonly used to determine K, Na, and Cl levels in China, the difference between these two methods needs to be evaluated.</p> </sec> <sec id="jcla21755-sec-0020" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A total of 4, 524 healthy participants (1, 916 males and 2, 608 females) between 20–79 years old from six cities in China were selected by strict criteria. Serum K, Na, and CL were tested on Roche Modular analyzers in six assigned laboratories. According to EP‐9A2, using Roche Modular analyzer (indirect ISE) as comparative method, Olympus AU 5400 analyzer (indirect ISE) and Johnson&amp;Johnson Fusion 5.1 analyzer (direct ISE) were evaluated.</p> </sec> <sec id="jcla21755-sec-0030" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>In Chinese population, the RIs for K, Na, and CL are 3.6–5.2, 136–146, and 99–110 mmol/l, respectively. Compared to the Roche indirect ISE method, Johnson direct ISE method showed a positive bias; and Olympus indirect ISE method just showed a very slight bias.</p> </sec> <sec id="jcla21755-sec-0040" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>The RIs of K, Na, and Cl of Han Chinese healthy adult population<abstract abstract-type="main"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec id="jcla21755-sec-0010" sec-type="section"> <title>Background</title> <p>Currently there are no reference intervals (RIs) of sodium (Na), potassium (K), and chlorine (Cl) on Chinese population. Two kinds of ion‐selective electrode (ISE) methods were commonly used to determine K, Na, and Cl levels in China, the difference between these two methods needs to be evaluated.</p> </sec> <sec id="jcla21755-sec-0020" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>A total of 4, 524 healthy participants (1, 916 males and 2, 608 females) between 20–79 years old from six cities in China were selected by strict criteria. Serum K, Na, and CL were tested on Roche Modular analyzers in six assigned laboratories. According to EP‐9A2, using Roche Modular analyzer (indirect ISE) as comparative method, Olympus AU 5400 analyzer (indirect ISE) and Johnson&amp;Johnson Fusion 5.1 analyzer (direct ISE) were evaluated.</p> </sec> <sec id="jcla21755-sec-0030" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>In Chinese population, the RIs for K, Na, and CL are 3.6–5.2, 136–146, and 99–110 mmol/l, respectively. Compared to the Roche indirect ISE method, Johnson direct ISE method showed a positive bias; and Olympus indirect ISE method just showed a very slight bias.</p> </sec> <sec id="jcla21755-sec-0040" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>The RIs of K, Na, and Cl of Han Chinese healthy adult population were found to be smaller than those provided by the manufacturer. By a criteria of biological variations for CV, the differences of Na and K between Roche analyzer and Johnson analyzer were not acceptable for clinical application, while the differences of Na, K, and Cl between Roche and Olympus analyzers were acceptable for clinical application.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of clinical laboratory analysis. Volume 29:Issue 3(2015)
- Journal:
- Journal of clinical laboratory analysis
- Issue:
- Volume 29:Issue 3(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 29, Issue 3 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 29
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0029-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 226
- Page End:
- 234
- Publication Date:
- 2014-05-05
- Subjects:
- Diagnosis, Laboratory -- Periodicals
Medical laboratory technology -- Periodicals
616 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1002/jcla.21755 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0887-8013
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4958.520000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3820.xml