Prenatal diagnosis versus first-trimester screening of trisomy 21 among pregnant women aged 35 or more. (April 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Prenatal diagnosis versus first-trimester screening of trisomy 21 among pregnant women aged 35 or more. (April 2015)
- Main Title:
- Prenatal diagnosis versus first-trimester screening of trisomy 21 among pregnant women aged 35 or more
- Authors:
- Ghi, Tullio
Arcangeli, Tiziana
Ravennati, Francesca
Salsi, Ginevra
Montaguti, Elisa
Pacella, Giuseppina
Maroni, Elisa
Pittalis, Maria Carla
Pompilii, Eva
Pilu, Gianluigi
Rizzo, Nicola - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title>Abstract</title> <p> <italic>Objective</italic>: To compare the policy of prenatal diagnosis versus first trimester screening of trisomy 21 among pregnant women of advanced age.</p> <p> <italic>Methods</italic>: A retrospective study was conducted on patients aged ≥35 divided in two groups: patients who requested first trimester combined test and only in case of screen-positive result underwent invasive testing (group A); patients undergoing chorionic villous sampling or amniocentesis as first investigation (group B). The following outcome variables were compared: antenatal detection of trisomy 21, occurrence of trisomy 21 at birth, miscarriage rate, hospitals' costs.</p> <p> <italic>Results</italic>: 4527 women were included. Of these, 534 (11.80%) underwent T21 screening whereas 3993 (88.20%) requested primary invasive testing. In group A, 64 combined test were positive (11.99%) and 8 trisomy 21 cases were diagnosed (1.50%); the loss of euploid fetuses after invasive procedure was 4.55% (2/44). No false-negative case was observed. In group B 57 cases of trisomy 21 were diagnosed (1.43%), and pregnancy loss rate of chromosomally normal fetuses was 0.45% (17/3806). The estimated cost was, respectively, 67.720€ for the primary screening versus 1.996.500€ for direct prenatal diagnosis.</p> <p> <italic>Conclusion</italic>: First trimester screening of trisomy 21 is highly accurate and cost saving among women ≥35.</p> </abstract>
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine. Volume 28:Number 6(2015)
- Journal:
- Journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 28:Number 6(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 28, Issue 6 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0028-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 674
- Page End:
- 678
- Publication Date:
- 2015-04
- Subjects:
- Obstetrics -- Periodicals
Perinatology -- Periodicals
Infants (Newborn) -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Neonatology -- Periodicals
618.2 - Journal URLs:
- http://informahealthcare.com/loi/jmf ↗
http://informahealthcare.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.3109/14767058.2014.928852 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1476-7058
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5012.332000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3230.xml