Clinical outcomes associated with evolving treatment modalities and radiation techniques for base‐of‐tongue carcinoma: thirty years of institutional experience. (26th January 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Clinical outcomes associated with evolving treatment modalities and radiation techniques for base‐of‐tongue carcinoma: thirty years of institutional experience. (26th January 2015)
- Main Title:
- Clinical outcomes associated with evolving treatment modalities and radiation techniques for base‐of‐tongue carcinoma: thirty years of institutional experience
- Authors:
- Chen, Leechuan Andy
Anker, Christopher J.
Hunt, Jason P.
Buchmann, Luke O.
Grossmann, Kenneth F.
Boucher, Kenneth
Fang, Li‐Ming Christine
Shrieve, Dennis C.
Hitchcock, Ying J. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main" id="cam4364-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Curative treatment for base‐of‐tongue squamous cell carcinoma (BOT SCC) has evolved over time; however, comparative outcomes analysis for various treatment strategies is lacking. The authors reviewed the evolution of treatment modality and radiotherapy (RT) technique for 231 consecutive BOT SCC patients at our institution between 1981 and 2011. Treatment modalities included definitive chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT) (42%), definitive RT (33%), surgery followed by RT (20%), and surgery alone (5%). RT techniques included external beam plus interstitial brachytherapy (EBRT + IB) (37%), conventional EBRT (29%), intensity‐modulated radiation therapy ± simultaneous integrated boost (IMRT ± SIB) (34%). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were stratified by modality or RT technique. Treatment modality evolved from definitive RT (1980s–1990s) to definitive chemoRT (1990s–2000s). RT technique evolved from EBRT + IB (1980s–1990s) to conventional EBRT (1990s–2000s) to IMRT + SIB (2000s). With median alive follow‐up of 6 years (0.3–28 years), the 5‐year LC, LRC, and OS rates were 80%, 73%, and 51%. There was no difference in distribution of gender, age, stage among treatment modalities. Definitive chemoRT had improved LRC (HR 1.6) and OS (HR 1.7) compared to definitive RT. IMRT + SIB had improved LRC (HR 3.2), DFS (HR 3.4), and OS (HR 3.0) compared to conventional EBRT. Over the past 30 years, BOT SCC<abstract abstract-type="main" id="cam4364-abs-0001"> <title>Abstract</title> <p>Curative treatment for base‐of‐tongue squamous cell carcinoma (BOT SCC) has evolved over time; however, comparative outcomes analysis for various treatment strategies is lacking. The authors reviewed the evolution of treatment modality and radiotherapy (RT) technique for 231 consecutive BOT SCC patients at our institution between 1981 and 2011. Treatment modalities included definitive chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT) (42%), definitive RT (33%), surgery followed by RT (20%), and surgery alone (5%). RT techniques included external beam plus interstitial brachytherapy (EBRT + IB) (37%), conventional EBRT (29%), intensity‐modulated radiation therapy ± simultaneous integrated boost (IMRT ± SIB) (34%). Clinical characteristics and outcomes were stratified by modality or RT technique. Treatment modality evolved from definitive RT (1980s–1990s) to definitive chemoRT (1990s–2000s). RT technique evolved from EBRT + IB (1980s–1990s) to conventional EBRT (1990s–2000s) to IMRT + SIB (2000s). With median alive follow‐up of 6 years (0.3–28 years), the 5‐year LC, LRC, and OS rates were 80%, 73%, and 51%. There was no difference in distribution of gender, age, stage among treatment modalities. Definitive chemoRT had improved LRC (HR 1.6) and OS (HR 1.7) compared to definitive RT. IMRT + SIB had improved LRC (HR 3.2), DFS (HR 3.4), and OS (HR 3.0) compared to conventional EBRT. Over the past 30 years, BOT SCC treatment has undergone major paradigm shifts that incorporate nonsurgical functional preservation, concurrent chemotherapy, and advanced RT techniques. Excellent locoregional control and survival outcomes are associated with accelerated IMRT with chemotherapy.</p> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Cancer medicine. Volume 4:Number 5(2015:May)
- Journal:
- Cancer medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 4:Number 5(2015:May)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 4, Issue 5 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 4
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0004-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 651
- Page End:
- 660
- Publication Date:
- 2015-01-26
- Subjects:
- 616.994005
- Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7634 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/cam4.364 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2045-7634
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3955.xml