Performance optimization of a bendable parabolic cylinder collimating X‐ray mirror for the ALS micro‐XAS beamline 10.3.2. (7th April 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yashchuk, Valeriy V.; Morrison, Gregory Y.; Marcus, Matthew A.; Domning, Edward E.; Merthe, Daniel J.; Salmassi, Farhad; Smith, Brian V.
• Is Part Of: Journal of synchrotron radiation. Volume 22:Part 3(2015)
• Page Start: 666
• Page End: 674
• Publication Date: 2015-04-07
• Subjects: Synchrotron radiation -- Periodicals; Free electron lasers -- Periodicals; 539.73505
• DOI: 10.1107/S1600577515001459
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0909-0495

Abstract

<abstract abstract-type="main" xml:lang="en"> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <p>The Advanced Light Source (ALS) beamline (BL) 10.3.2 is an apparatus for X‐ray microprobe spectroscopy and diffraction experiments, operating in the energy range 2.4–17 keV. The performance of the beamline, namely the spatial and energy resolutions of the measurements, depends significantly on the collimation quality of light incident on the monochromator. In the BL 10.3.2 end‐station, the synchrotron source is imaged 1:1 onto a set of roll slits which form a virtual source. The light from this source is collimated in the vertical direction by a bendable parabolic cylinder mirror. Details are presented of the mirror design, which allows for precision assembly, alignment and shaping of the mirror, as well as for extending of the mirror operating lifetime by a factor of ∼10. Assembly, mirror optimal shaping and preliminary alignment were performed <italic>ex situ</italic> in the ALS X‐ray Optics Laboratory (XROL). Using an original method for optimal <italic>ex situ</italic> characterization and setting of bendable X‐ray optics developed at the XROL, a root‐mean‐square (RMS) residual surface slope error of 0.31 µrad with respect to the desired parabola, and an RMS residual height error of less than 3 nm were achieved. Once in place at the beamline, deviations from the designed optical geometry (<italic>e.g.</italic> due to the tolerances for setting the distance to the virtual source, the grazing incidence angle, the transverse position) and/or mirror shape (<italic>e.g.</italic> due to a heat load deformation) may appear. Due to the errors, on installation the energy spread from the monochromator is typically a few electron‐volts. Here, a new technique developed and successfully implemented for at‐wavelength (<italic>in situ</italic>) fine optimal tuning of the mirror, enabling us to reduce the collimation‐induced energy spread to ∼0.05 eV, is described.</p> </abstract>