'Hope for safe prenatal gene tests'. A content analysis of how the UK press media are reporting advances in non‐invasive prenatal testing. (22nd September 2014)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 'Hope for safe prenatal gene tests'. A content analysis of how the UK press media are reporting advances in non‐invasive prenatal testing. (22nd September 2014)
- Main Title:
- 'Hope for safe prenatal gene tests'. A content analysis of how the UK press media are reporting advances in non‐invasive prenatal testing
- Authors:
- Lewis, Celine
Choudhury, Mahrufa
Chitty, Lyn S. - Abstract:
- <abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="pd4488-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To investigate how non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is portrayed in the UK press media.</p> </sec> <sec id="pd4488-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Content analysis of the ten most widely circulated print/digital news sources in the UK.</p> </sec> <sec id="pd4488-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Seventy‐nine articles were identified focusing on NIPT for Down syndrome (<italic>n</italic> = 67) including single gene disorders (<italic>n</italic> = 5), whole genome sequencing (<italic>n</italic> = 8), NIPT technology (<italic>n</italic> = 2), Rhesus D (<italic>n</italic> = 1) and fetal sex determination (<italic>n</italic> = 1). The majority (63%) were in 'serious' papers. Test attributes were frequently cited (100%), in particular that NIPT is a blood test (89%) and avoids risk of miscarriage (56%). The main psychosocial benefit reported was increased time for decision‐making (15%). Concerns were discussed less frequently than benefits (39%), with increase in termination rates the main concern raised (23%). The majority of headlines (52%) projected a positive frame towards NIPT. Regarding overall framing of articles, over two thirds (68%) presented benefits and concerns or limitations; however, only a third (35%) were considered 'balanced'.</p> </sec> <sec id="pd4488-sec-0004" sec-type="section"><abstract abstract-type="main"> <title>Abstract</title> <sec id="pd4488-sec-0001" sec-type="section"> <title>Objective</title> <p>To investigate how non‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is portrayed in the UK press media.</p> </sec> <sec id="pd4488-sec-0002" sec-type="section"> <title>Methods</title> <p>Content analysis of the ten most widely circulated print/digital news sources in the UK.</p> </sec> <sec id="pd4488-sec-0003" sec-type="section"> <title>Results</title> <p>Seventy‐nine articles were identified focusing on NIPT for Down syndrome (<italic>n</italic> = 67) including single gene disorders (<italic>n</italic> = 5), whole genome sequencing (<italic>n</italic> = 8), NIPT technology (<italic>n</italic> = 2), Rhesus D (<italic>n</italic> = 1) and fetal sex determination (<italic>n</italic> = 1). The majority (63%) were in 'serious' papers. Test attributes were frequently cited (100%), in particular that NIPT is a blood test (89%) and avoids risk of miscarriage (56%). The main psychosocial benefit reported was increased time for decision‐making (15%). Concerns were discussed less frequently than benefits (39%), with increase in termination rates the main concern raised (23%). The majority of headlines (52%) projected a positive frame towards NIPT. Regarding overall framing of articles, over two thirds (68%) presented benefits and concerns or limitations; however, only a third (35%) were considered 'balanced'.</p> </sec> <sec id="pd4488-sec-0004" sec-type="section"> <title>Conclusion</title> <p>Positive reporting of NIPT in the UK news media reflects the publics' broadly optimistic view towards genomic technology and prenatal testing. Health professionals should be aware that women may have incomplete information or misunderstandings about NIPT. Pre‐test counselling to ensure informed decision‐making is therefore important. © 2014 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Prenatal diagnosis. Volume 35:Number 5(2015:May)
- Journal:
- Prenatal diagnosis
- Issue:
- Volume 35:Number 5(2015:May)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 35, Issue 5 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 35
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0035-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 420
- Page End:
- 427
- Publication Date:
- 2014-09-22
- Subjects:
- Prenatal diagnosis -- Periodicals
Fetus -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
618.32075 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1002/pd.4488 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0197-3851
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6607.646000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3537.xml