Factors Influencing Incidence and Type of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction in an Urban Multidisciplinary Cancer Center. Issue 2 (February 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Factors Influencing Incidence and Type of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction in an Urban Multidisciplinary Cancer Center. Issue 2 (February 2015)
- Main Title:
- Factors Influencing Incidence and Type of Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction in an Urban Multidisciplinary Cancer Center
- Authors:
- Iskandar, Mazen E.
Dayan, Erez
Lucido, David
Samson, William
Sultan, Mark
Dayan, Joseph H.
Boolbol, Susan K.
Smith, Mark L. - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Background:</title> <p>On January 1, 2011, New York State amended the Public Health Law to ensure that patients receive "information and access to breast reconstruction surgery." The purposes of this study were to investigate the early impact of this legislation on reconstruction rates and to evaluate the influence of patient variables versus physician variables on the incidence and type of breast reconstruction performed.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Methods:</title> <p>A retrospective study was conducted on all patients who underwent mastectomy between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2011. Reconstruction rates were analyzed in relation to timing of legislation, breast surgeon variables, plastic surgeon faculty status, type of reconstruction, and patient variables.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results:</title> <p>Two hundred fifty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. The overall reconstruction rate was 56.59 percent. There was no statistically significant increase in reconstruction rate after the 2011 legislation (OR, 0.45; <italic>p</italic> = 0.057). Patients whose breast surgeon was female were more likely to undergo reconstruction (OR, 5.17; <italic>p</italic> = 0.001). Patients who were Asian (OR, 0.22; <italic>p</italic> = 0.002), older than 60 years (OR, 0.09; <italic>p</italic> = 0.001), or had stage 3 and 4 cancer (OR, 0.04; <italic>p</italic> = 0.03) were less likely to undergo reconstruction.<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Background:</title> <p>On January 1, 2011, New York State amended the Public Health Law to ensure that patients receive "information and access to breast reconstruction surgery." The purposes of this study were to investigate the early impact of this legislation on reconstruction rates and to evaluate the influence of patient variables versus physician variables on the incidence and type of breast reconstruction performed.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Methods:</title> <p>A retrospective study was conducted on all patients who underwent mastectomy between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2011. Reconstruction rates were analyzed in relation to timing of legislation, breast surgeon variables, plastic surgeon faculty status, type of reconstruction, and patient variables.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results:</title> <p>Two hundred fifty-eight patients met inclusion criteria. The overall reconstruction rate was 56.59 percent. There was no statistically significant increase in reconstruction rate after the 2011 legislation (OR, 0.45; <italic>p</italic> = 0.057). Patients whose breast surgeon was female were more likely to undergo reconstruction (OR, 5.17; <italic>p</italic> = 0.001). Patients who were Asian (OR, 0.22; <italic>p</italic> = 0.002), older than 60 years (OR, 0.09; <italic>p</italic> = 0.001), or had stage 3 and 4 cancer (OR, 0.04; <italic>p</italic> = 0.03) were less likely to undergo reconstruction. Patients reconstructed by a hospital-employed plastic surgeon were significantly more likely to undergo autologous versus implant reconstruction (OR, 6.85; <italic>p</italic> = 0.001) and to undergo microsurgical versus nonmicrosurgical autologous reconstruction (78.2 percent versus 0 percent; <italic>p</italic> = 0.001).</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusions:</title> <p>Breast surgeon sex and plastic surgeon faculty status were the factors that most affected the rate and type of reconstruction, respectively. Legislation mandating the discussion of breast reconstruction options had no impact on reconstruction rate.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:</title> <p>Risk, II.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Volume 135:Issue 2(2015:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Plastic and reconstructive surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 135:Issue 2(2015:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 135, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 135
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0135-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-02
- Subjects:
- Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals
617.95205 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000888 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0032-1052
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6528.924000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4285.xml