Open-door versus French-door laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical multilevel compressive myelopathy. Issue 3 (March 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Open-door versus French-door laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical multilevel compressive myelopathy. Issue 3 (March 2015)
- Main Title:
- Open-door versus French-door laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical multilevel compressive myelopathy
- Authors:
- Wang, Liang
Wang, Yipeng
Yu, Bin
Li, Zhengyao
Liu, Xiaoyang - Abstract:
- <abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="ab005"> <title id="st115">Abstract</title> <sec> <p id="sp0005">Open-door laminoplasty (ODL) and French-door laminoplasty (FDL) are used to treat cervical multilevel compressive myelopathy. However, differences in outcome between the approaches remain unknown. To investigate treatment differences, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Four comparative trials were identified and analyzed in the review. The results showed that ODL had a higher postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score than FDL (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47 to 1.19; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two methods in terms of operative time (WMD = −6.76; 95% CI: −21.70 to 8.18; <italic>p</italic> = 0.38), intraoperative blood loss (WMD = 41.70; 95% CI: −61.43 to 144.82; <italic>p</italic> = 0.43), total complication rate (OR = 2.43, 95% CI: 0.22 to 27.04; <italic>p</italic> = 0.47), postoperative C5 palsy (OR = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.46 to 8.39; <italic>p</italic> = 0.36), postoperative cervical lordosis (WMD = −0.60; 95% CI: −0.37 to 1.86; <italic>p</italic> = 0.63) or range of motion (WMD = −4.62; 95% CI: −13.06 to 3.82; <italic>p</italic> = 0.28). These results suggest that neither cervical laminoplasty approach is superior to the other based on the postoperative radiological data and complication rate, although ODL had higher postoperative JOA<abstract xml:lang="en" abstract-type="author" id="ab005"> <title id="st115">Abstract</title> <sec> <p id="sp0005">Open-door laminoplasty (ODL) and French-door laminoplasty (FDL) are used to treat cervical multilevel compressive myelopathy. However, differences in outcome between the approaches remain unknown. To investigate treatment differences, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Four comparative trials were identified and analyzed in the review. The results showed that ODL had a higher postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score than FDL (weighted mean difference [WMD] = 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47 to 1.19; <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two methods in terms of operative time (WMD = −6.76; 95% CI: −21.70 to 8.18; <italic>p</italic> = 0.38), intraoperative blood loss (WMD = 41.70; 95% CI: −61.43 to 144.82; <italic>p</italic> = 0.43), total complication rate (OR = 2.43, 95% CI: 0.22 to 27.04; <italic>p</italic> = 0.47), postoperative C5 palsy (OR = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.46 to 8.39; <italic>p</italic> = 0.36), postoperative cervical lordosis (WMD = −0.60; 95% CI: −0.37 to 1.86; <italic>p</italic> = 0.63) or range of motion (WMD = −4.62; 95% CI: −13.06 to 3.82; <italic>p</italic> = 0.28). These results suggest that neither cervical laminoplasty approach is superior to the other based on the postoperative radiological data and complication rate, although ODL had higher postoperative JOA score than FDL.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of clinical neuroscience. Volume 22:Issue 3(2015:Mar.)
- Journal:
- Journal of clinical neuroscience
- Issue:
- Volume 22:Issue 3(2015:Mar.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 22, Issue 3 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 22
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0022-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 450
- Page End:
- 455
- Publication Date:
- 2015-03
- Subjects:
- Brain -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Neurosciences -- Periodicals
Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Brain -- surgery -- Periodicals
Neurosurgical Procedures -- Periodicals
Neurosciences -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.8 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09675868 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/09675868 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.08.022 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0967-5868
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4958.585000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3614.xml