Magnetically Guided Capsule Versus Conventional Gastroscopy for Upper Abdominal Complaints. Issue 2 (February 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Magnetically Guided Capsule Versus Conventional Gastroscopy for Upper Abdominal Complaints. Issue 2 (February 2015)
- Main Title:
- Magnetically Guided Capsule Versus Conventional Gastroscopy for Upper Abdominal Complaints
- Authors:
- Denzer, Ulrike W.
Rösch, Thomas
Hoytat, Bilal
Abdel-Hamid, Mohammed
Hebuterne, Xavier
Vanbiervielt, Geoffroy
Filippi, Jérôme
Ogata, Haruiko
Hosoe, Naoki
Ohtsuka, Kazuo
Ogata, Noriyuki
Ikeda, Keiichi
Aihara, Hiroyuki
Kudo, Shin-Ei
Tajiri, Hisao
Treszl, Andras
Wegscheider, Karl
Greff, Michel
Rey, Jean-Francois - Abstract:
- <abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Objectives:</title> <p>Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is mostly performed under sedation and has a low yield of relevant gastric lesions in patients without alarm symptoms. Simpler screening tests such as capsule endoscopy could be helpful, but gastric visualization is insufficient with the current passive capsules. A magnetically guided gastric capsule was prospectively evaluated in patients with routine indications for gastroscopy.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Methods:</title> <p>A total of 189 symptomatic patients (105 male; mean age 53 y) from 2 French centers subsequently and blindly underwent capsule and conventional gastroscopy by 9 and 6 examiners, respectively. The final gold standard was unblinded conventional gastroscopy with biopsy under propofol sedation. Main outcome was accuracy (sensitivity/specificity) of capsule gastroscopy for diagnosis of major gastric lesions, defined as those lesions requiring conventional gastroscopy for biopsy or removal.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results:</title> <p>Twenty-three major lesions were found in 21 patients. Capsule accuracy was 90.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 85.4%-94.3%] with a specificity of 94.1% (95% CI, 89.3%-97.1%) and a sensitivity of 61.9% (95% CI, 38%-82%). Accuracy did not correlate with lesion location, gastric luminal visibility, examiner case volume, or examination time. Of the remaining 168 patients, 94% had minor and mostly<abstract> <title> <x xml:space="preserve">Abstract</x> </title> <sec> <title>Objectives:</title> <p>Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is mostly performed under sedation and has a low yield of relevant gastric lesions in patients without alarm symptoms. Simpler screening tests such as capsule endoscopy could be helpful, but gastric visualization is insufficient with the current passive capsules. A magnetically guided gastric capsule was prospectively evaluated in patients with routine indications for gastroscopy.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Methods:</title> <p>A total of 189 symptomatic patients (105 male; mean age 53 y) from 2 French centers subsequently and blindly underwent capsule and conventional gastroscopy by 9 and 6 examiners, respectively. The final gold standard was unblinded conventional gastroscopy with biopsy under propofol sedation. Main outcome was accuracy (sensitivity/specificity) of capsule gastroscopy for diagnosis of major gastric lesions, defined as those lesions requiring conventional gastroscopy for biopsy or removal.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Results:</title> <p>Twenty-three major lesions were found in 21 patients. Capsule accuracy was 90.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 85.4%-94.3%] with a specificity of 94.1% (95% CI, 89.3%-97.1%) and a sensitivity of 61.9% (95% CI, 38%-82%). Accuracy did not correlate with lesion location, gastric luminal visibility, examiner case volume, or examination time. Of the remaining 168 patients, 94% had minor and mostly multiple lesions; the capsule made a correct diagnosis in 88.1% (95% CI, 82.2%-92.6%), with gastric visibility and lesion location in the proximal stomach having significant influence. All patients preferred capsule gastroscopy.</p> </sec> <sec> <title>Conclusions:</title> <p>In a prospective and strictly blinded study, magnetically guided capsule gastroscopy was shown to be feasible in clinical practice and was clearly preferred by patients. Improvements in capsule technology may render this technique a future alternative to gastroscopy.</p> </sec> </abstract> … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of clinical gastroenterology. Volume 49:Issue 2(2015)
- Journal:
- Journal of clinical gastroenterology
- Issue:
- Volume 49:Issue 2(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 49, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 49
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0049-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-02
- Subjects:
- Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Gastroenterology -- Periodicals
Digestive organs -- Diseases
Gastroenterology
Periodicals
Periodicals
616.33005 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/jcge/Pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www.jcge.com ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00004836-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000110 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0192-0790
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4958.470000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 3087.xml